Skip to content

docs: add Cursor Cloud setup notes to AGENTS.md#17

Merged
bschellenberger2600 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/setup-dev-environment-0d13
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

docs: add Cursor Cloud setup notes to AGENTS.md#17
bschellenberger2600 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/setup-dev-environment-0d13

Conversation

@bschellenberger2600

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Sets up and verifies the development environment for git-rain and records durable, non-obvious caveats for future Cloud Agents in AGENTS.md under ## Cursor Cloud specific instructions. No application code changed.

Why this change?

Future agents start in a VM with the update script (go mod download) already run. The notes capture environment gotchas that are not obvious from README/Makefile: make lint is only go vet (CI also runs golangci-lint + shellcheck), make test-race is slow because internal/git shells out to real git, and running the CLI persists registry/config state (so use --path <sandbox> for isolated runs).

Bug Reproducibility (if this fixes a bug)

N/A — environment setup only.

Tests

  • I added or updated tests for all code changes in this PR.
  • For bug fixes, I added regression coverage.
  • I ran go test -race -count=1 ./....
  • I ran go vet ./....

Verified in this environment:

  • make build — built ./git-rain
  • make lint (go vet ./...) — clean
  • golangci-lint run --timeout=5m (v2.11.4) — 0 issues
  • shellcheck scripts/install.sh — clean
  • make test-race — all packages pass
  • End-to-end: git-rain --sync fast-forwarded a local clone to an upstream commit

git_rain_hello_world.log

Risk / Rollback Notes (optional)

Docs-only change; revert the commit to roll back.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Co-authored-by: Ben Schellenberger <bschellenberger2600@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@bschellenberger2600, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 48 minutes and 25 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d9b7a060-9818-4a43-8fa9-fcc68cb273f9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3af70fd and 851fd9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • AGENTS.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch cursor/setup-dev-environment-0d13

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@bschellenberger2600
bschellenberger2600 marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2026 02:02

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot completed successfully, but no corresponding Cursor[bot] review comment was found — withholding approval until that signal is present. Human review is still required; no reviewers were assigned because the only repo collaborator is the PR author.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver

@bschellenberger2600
bschellenberger2600 merged commit 96f25f8 into main Jun 17, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant