Repository navigation
Fix review provenance, formula fallbacks, and attachment publication - #17
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PairTeX could reject valid conditional/BibTeX renders, silently lose formulas without MathJax, drop linked attachments, and label non-Git projects as version tracked. This change preserves a usable review surface and honest source provenance across those cases.
Validation:
The generic mapper deliberately makes the entire document's formulas read-only for uncertain TeX expansion; an adapter with explicit anchors is required to enable direct formula edits there. MathML validation is structural, not a full browser layout guarantee. CSS url() dependencies and secondary HTML links are not recursively crawled.
Fixes #13
Fixes #14
Fixes #15
Fixes #16