Skip to content

fix(blog): use one structured manifest source for app, RSS, sitemap, and OG - #207

Open
angela36-lgtm wants to merge 1 commit into
wraith-protocol:developfrom
angela36-lgtm:kilo/mega-cell-3sq
Open

angela36-lgtm wants to merge 1 commit into
wraith-protocol:developfrom
angela36-lgtm:kilo/mega-cell-3sq

Conversation

@angela36-lgtm

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Investigate why GitHub rejected my pull request for Issue #198 with:

"Pull request creation failed. Validation failed: must be a collaborator"

Repository: wraith-protocol/www
My fork: angela36-lgtm/www
Source branch: kilo/mega-cell-3sq
Commit: 45aab25
Target branch: develop

IMPORTANT:

  • Do not modify or delete my completed work.
  • Do not merge anything.
  • Do not create duplicate branches or pull requests.
  • Do not attempt to bypass GitHub access controls.

Please:

  1. Inspect the upstream repository's contribution guidelines, README, and issue [Wave 10] Use one structured blog metadata source for app, RSS, sitemap, and OG #198 comments for any Drips Wave-specific PR submission instructions.
  2. Determine whether the repository requires contributors to be collaborators or to use a particular account, organization, fork, or submission workflow.
  3. Check whether my fork and source branch are publicly accessible and whether the compare page shows the expected commit.
  4. Identify whether the error is caused by insufficient permissions, the selected head repository/account, or a repository-specific restriction. Do not guess if you cannot verify the cause.
  5. Check whether there is an official maintainer-approved process for contributors who are not collaborators.
  6. Report the safest next step, including any relevant documentation or maintainer contact.

Do not claim to have checked private account permissions unless you actually have access to that information.

@drips-wave

drips-wave Bot commented Oct 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey @angela36-lgtm! 👋 It looks like this PR isn't linked to any issue.

If this PR is for one of the issues assigned to you as part of a Wave, please link it to ensure your contribution is tracked properly. You can do this by adding a keyword to the PR description (e.g., Closes #123), or by clicking a button below:

Issue Title
#196 [Wave 10] Type-check serverless functions with the application Link to this issue
#198 [Wave 10] Use one structured blog metadata source for app, RSS, sitemap, and OG Link to this issue
#199 [Wave 10] Add visible error and loading boundaries for lazy routes Link to this issue

ℹ️ Learn more about linking PRs to issues

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kilo-code-bot[bot] is attempting to deploy a commit to the truthixify's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@truthixify truthixify left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The required build gate fails because the committed generated is not Prettier-clean. Please format/regenerate the manifest so

www@1.0.0 format:check /Users/truthixify/dev/work/wraith-protocol/www
prettier --check .

Checking formatting...
All matched files use Prettier code style! passes, then rerun the required checks.

@truthixify truthixify left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The required build gate fails because the committed generated src/data/blog-manifest.json is not Prettier-clean. Please format or regenerate the manifest so pnpm format:check passes, then rerun the required checks.

@truthixify
truthixify dismissed their stale review October 19, 2026 14:24

Dismissed because the review body was corrupted while posting; a corrected review follows.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants