owl-lst-thesis:0.1.0

[alexanderkoller]

I am submitting

• a new package
• an update for a package

This is a Typst thesis style for the Department of Language Science and Technology at Saarland University. Students can use this for your Bachelor's or Master's Thesis or any other document they like.

The style is not completely official, in the sense that the department will not require students to use it. But I am a professor at this department, and the exam office will link to the template from its page. In that sense, it will be officially supported.

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

• selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does
  • Explanation: The owl is the logo of Saarland University, prominently featured on the title page, and the owl logo is the basis of the template's color scheme.
• added a typst.toml file with all required keys
• added a README.md with documentation for my package
• have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md
• tested my package locally on my system and it worked
• excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE

• ensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.

[alexanderkoller]

Editors, a package check failed, but Github doesn't show me what check actually failed. Could you look into this and help me understand what the problem is?

[elegaanz]

It is a bug in the linter: because you exclude /main.typ and we don't change the root correctly when checking that the template builds, it considers that template/main.typ is excluded and can't be loaded. The actual bundler seems to include this file in the archive, so don't worry about it. Sorry for the false positive.

I had a look at the package, and it looks good to me. Thank you for submitting it :)

[alexanderkoller]

Thanks! Can I do anything to prevent the false positive for the next release?

[elegaanz]

I don't think so, but we will try fix it before that 🤞