Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions Analysis/Section_3_5.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ noncomputable abbrev SetTheory.Set.prod_associator (X Y Z:Set) : (X ×ˢ Y) ×ˢ
right_inv _ := by simp

/--
Example 3.5.10. I suspect most of the equivalences will require classical reasoning and only be
Example 3.5.10 (a). I suspect most of the equivalences will require classical reasoning and only be
defined non-computably, but would be happy to learn of counterexamples.
-/
noncomputable abbrev SetTheory.Set.singleton_iProd_equiv (i:Object) (X:Set) :
Expand All @@ -209,30 +209,30 @@ noncomputable abbrev SetTheory.Set.singleton_iProd_equiv (i:Object) (X:Set) :
left_inv := sorry
right_inv := sorry

/-- Example 3.5.10 -/
/-- Example 3.5.10 (b) -/
abbrev SetTheory.Set.empty_iProd_equiv (X: (∅:Set) → Set) : iProd X ≃ Unit where
toFun := sorry
invFun := sorry
left_inv := sorry
right_inv := sorry

/-- Example 3.5.10 -/
/-- Example 3.5.10 (c) -/
noncomputable abbrev SetTheory.Set.iProd_of_const_equiv (I:Set) (X: Set) :
iProd (fun _:I ↦ X) ≃ (I → X) where
toFun := sorry
invFun := sorry
left_inv := sorry
right_inv := sorry

/-- Example 3.5.10 -/
/-- Example 3.5.10 (d) -/
noncomputable abbrev SetTheory.Set.iProd_equiv_prod (X: ({0,1}:Set) → Set) :
iProd X ≃ (X ⟨ 0, by simp ⟩) ×ˢ (X ⟨ 1, by simp ⟩) where
toFun := sorry
invFun := sorry
left_inv := sorry
right_inv := sorry

/-- Example 3.5.10 -/
/-- Example 3.5.10 (e) -/
noncomputable abbrev SetTheory.Set.iProd_equiv_prod_triple (X: ({0,1,2}:Set) → Set) :
iProd X ≃ (X ⟨ 0, by simp ⟩) ×ˢ (X ⟨ 1, by simp ⟩) ×ˢ (X ⟨ 2, by simp ⟩) where
toFun := sorry
Expand Down
Loading