Skip to content

SDKs: mark the Join helper as since 1.44.0 after the 1.43.0 release - #1564

Merged
longquanzheng merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/join-since-1-44
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

longquanzheng merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/join-since-1-44

Conversation

@longquanzheng

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Marks the Join helper (and Java's List overloads of StepDecision.goToMany and RPCResult.of) as Since 1.44.0 and moves their change log entries from the released ## 1.43 section to a new unreleased ## 1.44 section in the Go, Java, Python, Rust, and TypeScript references.

  • Source markers moved to 1.44.0: Go join.go; Java Join.java, JoinRound.java, RPCResult.java, StepDecision.java; Python join.py, flow.py (PersistenceSchema.of); Rust join.rs, persistence.rs; TypeScript join.ts, persistence.ts.
  • Markers of changes actually released in 1.43.0 are untouched (Go standalone_context.go, Python flow_config.py).
  • Each ## 1.43 section now matches its content at the sdk-<lang>/v1.43.0 tag (apart from the release line written after tagging).

Why

sdk-{go,python,java,typescript,rust}/v1.43.0 were tagged at b76d1da (#1544) before the Join helper PRs (#1549, #1550, #1552, #1553, #1554) merged, so 1.43.0 does not contain them, but those PRs had placed their entries under the released 1.43 section and marked the API 1.43.0.

doc-map: no change needed: version markers and change log placement only

Testing

  • Go make docsCheck, Python scripts/check_public_docs.py, Rust make docs-check, TypeScript npm run docs:check, Java ./gradlew javadoc, cd docs && npm run check.
  • Compared each ## 1.43 section with the tag.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@longquanzheng
longquanzheng merged commit a2467ce into main Nov 11, 2026
43 checks passed
@longquanzheng
longquanzheng deleted the fix/join-since-1-44 branch November 11, 2026 02:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant