Skip to content

About

Practical Data Governance and Responsible AI operating model with implementation guidance, templates, metrics and risk-based controls.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Repository files navigation

Data Governance + Responsible AI Framework

A practical operating model for establishing data governance and using governed, trusted data as the foundation for responsible AI adoption.

Data Governance → Trusted Data → AI Readiness → Responsible AI → Measurement → Scale

Status: Maintained reference implementation
Last reviewed: October 2026


This repository is designed for technology, data, security, risk and business leaders who need to move beyond policy statements and create governance that can actually operate, produce evidence and improve over time.


How this framework fits

This repository is the broader implementation library for Data Governance and Responsible AI.

For a focused practical toolkit connecting data classification, lineage and governance decision rights, see the Data Governance Toolkit.

The two repositories are complementary:

  • Data Governance Toolkit — focused practical guidance for Classify → Trace → Govern
  • Data Governance + Responsible AI Framework — broader operating model, implementation guidance, templates, metrics and Responsible AI controls

Why this exists

Data governance often fails because it becomes a documentation exercise. AI governance can fail for the same reason when it is treated as a separate compliance silo.

This framework takes a simpler approach:

  1. identify the data that matters;
  2. assign clear business ownership;
  3. define minimum standards;
  4. implement proportionate controls;
  5. produce evidence;
  6. measure and improve;
  7. apply those same foundations to AI use.

Responsible AI depends on governed data.


Core operating model

Data governance

Discover → Define → Assign → Control → Measure → Improve

Stage Purpose
Discover Identify critical data, systems, domains, flows and governance gaps.
Define Set minimum expectations for ownership, quality, classification, access, lineage and lifecycle.
Assign Make business ownership, stewardship and technical custodianship explicit.
Control Implement practical controls and retain evidence.
Measure Track whether governance is operating and where risk remains.
Improve Use issues, incidents, audits, business change and metrics to mature the model.

Responsible AI

Intake → Triage → Assess → Approve → Pilot → Monitor → Scale / Restrict / Retire

AI governance is treated as an extension of the data-governance model rather than a second bureaucracy.


Quick start

Start with:

  1. 3–5 critical data domains
  2. a named Data Owner and Data Steward for each
  3. a simple classification model
  4. a handful of measurable data-quality rules
  5. a repeatable access review
  6. a data issue register
  7. an AI register
  8. an AI use-case intake and risk assessment
  9. an approved AI tools register
  10. an incident / exception process

See QUICKSTART.md for the implementation sequence.


Repository structure

data-governance-framework/
├── README.md
├── QUICKSTART.md
├── INDEX.md
├── CHANGELOG.md
├── DISCLAIMER.md
├── data-governance/
├── responsible-ai/
├── templates/
├── examples/
└── reference/

Data Governance library

Module Focus
01 — Governance Principles Practical principles that guide governance decisions.
02 — Operating Model Governance layers, forums, decision rights and escalation.
03 — Ownership & Stewardship Business owners, stewards, custodians and consumers.
04 — Data Classification Simple risk-based classification and handling.
05 — Data Quality Fitness for purpose, quality rules and issue management.
06 — Access & Security Business approval, IAM, least privilege and evidence.
07 — Lineage & Metadata Proportionate traceability for critical data and decisions.
08 — Retention & Lifecycle Collection, use, sharing, retention and disposal.
09 — Third-Party Data Supplier processing, shared responsibility and exit.
10 — Implementation Roadmap Minimum viable governance and 30/60/90-day rollout.
11 — Metrics & Reporting Practical KPIs/KRIs and executive reporting.
12 — Maturity Model Risk-based progression from uncontrolled to adaptive.
13 — Framework Alignment High-level alignment to Australian guidance, NIST, ISO and privacy/security controls.

Responsible AI library

The Responsible AI package extends the same operating model into AI adoption and assurance.


Templates and examples

The templates folder contains practical registers, assessments, checklists and governance artefacts. CSV versions are included for several working registers.

The examples folder contains illustrative examples for:

  • a customer data domain;
  • an internal generative-AI tender assistant;
  • AI risk-tiering scenarios.

Framework references

This library draws on high-level concepts from:

  • Australian Government / National AI Centre — Guidance for AI Adoption
  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework
  • NIST Generative AI Profile
  • ISO/IEC 42001 — AI management systems
  • Australian Privacy Principles
  • ISO/IEC 27001 — information security management

See reference/references.md.

This repository does not reproduce proprietary ISO clause text and does not claim certification or formal compliance with any standard.


Executive explanation

We start by identifying the data that matters, assign accountable owners, define quality, access, lifecycle and lineage expectations, and put evidence around those controls. Responsible AI then sits on top of that model: each use case has an owner, a risk tier, a data-readiness assessment, human oversight, testing and monitoring. Governance effort is deliberately scaled to the risk rather than becoming bureaucracy.


Design philosophy

Business Problem → Practical Pattern → Control → Evidence → Outcome

The objective is not to maximise governance activity. It is to make ownership, decisions, controls and evidence visible enough that the organisation can use data and AI confidently.


Use and adaptation

This repository is a practical reference framework and should be adapted for organisational size, maturity, risk appetite, sector, jurisdiction, technology environment and regulatory obligations.

It is not legal, privacy, regulatory or certification advice.


Author

Rakesh Randeria
Technology Executive | Strategy | Transformation | Cybersecurity | AI & Digital Enablement

About

Practical Data Governance and Responsible AI operating model with implementation guidance, templates, metrics and risk-based controls.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors