forked from WebKit/WebKit
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
Atomics.wait: wake for a termination requested from another thread #392
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
dylan-conway
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
dylan/atomics-wait-termination
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+15
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔴 This widens
WaitSyncResult::Terminatedto cover the "only aNeedTerminationtrap bit is set" state, but the second caller ofwaitSync()— Wasm'swaitImpl()inWasmOperationsInlines.h:750— was not updated and still callsvm.throwTerminationException()directly, whichASSERT(hasTerminationRequest())s. Terminating a worker blocked inmemory.atomic.wait32/64will now hit that debug assertion (and in release, throw withm_hasTerminationRequestunset and the trap bit still pending). The Wasm caller needs the samehasTerminationRequest()/handleTraps(NeedTermination)branch you added inAtomicsObject.cpp, orwaitSyncImplcould handle the trap itself before returningTerminated.Extended reasoning...
What changed and why it breaks the Wasm path
Before this PR,
waitSyncImpl()only returnedWaitSyncResult::Terminatedwhenvm.hasTerminationRequest()was already true. Both callers therefore safely responded with a barevm.throwTerminationException().This PR broadens the condition:
terminationRequested()now also fires whenvm.traps().needHandling(VMTraps::NeedTermination)is true — i.e. when another thread has set the trap bit viaVM::notifyNeedTermination()but this thread has not yet runVMTraps::handleTraps()to recordm_hasTerminationRequest. The PR description explicitly calls out thatthrowTerminationException()"assertshasTerminationRequest()", and correctly updates the JSAtomics.waitcaller inAtomicsObject.cpp:472-478to branch: ifhasTerminationRequest()is already set, throw directly; otherwise callvm.traps().handleTraps(VMTraps::NeedTermination), which sets the request and throws.However,
WaiterListManager::waitSync()has exactly one other caller: Wasm'swaitImpl()inSource/JavaScriptCore/wasm/WasmOperationsInlines.h:738-755, reached frommemory.atomic.wait32/wait64in every Wasm tier (memoryAtomicWait32/64,operationMemoryAtomicWait32/64,ipint_extern_memory_atomic_wait32/64). That caller was not touched:And
VM::throwTerminationException()(VM.cpp:1102) begins withASSERT(hasTerminationRequest());VM::setException()(VM.cpp:1093) asserts the same invariant.Step-by-step proof
memory.atomic.wait32on shared memory with no timeout. Control reacheswaitImpl()→WaiterListManager::waitSync()→waitSyncImpl(), which parks onsyncWaiter->condition().waitUntil(...).worker.terminate()→VM::notifyNeedTermination(). This fires theNeedTerminationtrap bit and (viaVMTraps::requestThreadStopIfNeeded/ SignalSender) notifies the sync waiter's condition. Crucially it does not setm_hasTerminationRequest— that only happens inVMTraps::handleTraps()on the target thread.waitSyncImplwakes and re-evaluates the loop guard.terminationRequested()returns true becausevm.traps().needHandling(VMTraps::NeedTermination)is true, even thoughvm.hasTerminationRequest()is still false. The loop exits, the waiter is dequeued, and the function returnsWaitSyncResult::Terminated.waitImpl(), theTerminatedcase callsvm.throwTerminationException().VM::throwTerminationException()executesASSERT(hasTerminationRequest())→ debug-build assertion failure.In release builds the asserts compile out and the
TerminationExceptionis thrown, butm_hasTerminationRequestis never set and theNeedTerminationtrap bit is never cleared — violating the VM invariant thathasTerminationRequest()is set whenever aTerminationExceptionis pending, and leaving a stale trap bit to be re-handled at the next trap check.Why nothing else prevents it
The only guard is at the call sites. The PR added the guard to one of the two call sites and left the other unchanged. There is no fallback in
throwTerminationException()that promotes the trap bit to a request; it simply asserts.Fix
Apply the same treatment to
WasmOperationsInlines.h:749-751:Alternatively, centralize this: have
waitSyncImplcallvm.traps().handleTraps(VMTraps::NeedTermination)(or otherwise record the request) before returningTerminated, so both callers can keep the barethrowTerminationException()and future callers can't make the same mistake.