Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

Please clarify licening information #14

Description

@xnox

Appears to be an empty file, please provide contents or remove this file. If this file was added to simply pacify autotools, maybe using AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign]) option is a better way to remove the autotools warnings. Ditto other empty files, e.g. NEWS, AUTHORS.

Has an odd copyright statement, and license. My understanding is that the OpenSSL project is not the copyright holder, but IBM is. Also OpenSSL project is undergoing a license transition to Apache v2, thus the OpenSSL license is no longer preferred license for the upstream project. Have you considered relicensing under Apache v2? Is that even possible?

Also I am failing to find any source files, that are supposedly covered by the LICENSE text.

Above files do not appear to have any license mentioned at the top of the file in a comment header. By default, that implies that these are proprietary.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions