-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 604
[ENG-401] fix: token queue should respect sub queues while calling serve next #3708
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
nandkishorr
wants to merge
7
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
ENG-401-token-queue-should-respect-sub-queues-while-calling-serve-next
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
637e5ce
fix:added proper token assigning
nandkishorr 9d383a7
fix:added proper token validation and clear current token
nandkishorr bc2eec6
Merge branch 'develop' into ENG-401-token-queue-should-respect-sub-qu…
nandkishorr 14ac7ae
greptile review and fix tests
nandkishorr a7ace39
Merge branch 'ENG-401-token-queue-should-respect-sub-queues-while-cal…
nandkishorr 140b0b1
cleanup
nandkishorr b21fa4a
added lock
nandkishorr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sub_queueis nullThe new validation at lines 94–98 that blocks direct
IN_PROGRESSupdates lives insideif model_obj and instance.sub_queue:. A caller that sends{"status": "in_progress", "sub_queue": null}satisfies pydantic (sinceTokenUpdateSpec.sub_queue: UUID4 | Noneaccepts null) but makesinstance.sub_queuefalsy, so the entire guard is skipped. The token then transitions toIN_PROGRESSwithsub_queue = nullinperform_update— the old sub-queue'scurrent_tokengets cleared, but nothing sets a newcurrent_token, leaving the queue in an inconsistent state.The
IN_PROGRESSstatus check should be guarded onmodel_objalone, independent of whether a sub-queue is being provided in the same request.