[nbudin]

Summary

Declares the react / react-dom peer dependencies that two packages were missing, so consumers' package managers stop reporting unmet peer requirements for litform.

A consumer that installs @neinteractiveliterature/litform@0.36.0 currently gets (from Yarn 4's explain peer-requirements):

litform@0.36.0 doesn't provide react to litform-codemirror@0.36.0 and 7 other dependencies
litform@0.36.0 doesn't provide react-dom to litform-popovers@0.36.0 and 1 other dependency
litform-modals@0.36.0 doesn't provide react-dom to react-bootstrap4-modal@3.0.11

• litform (the umbrella package): adds peerDependencies react >= 18 and react-dom >= 18. Its sub-packages, react-cool-onclickoutside, @floating-ui/react-dom and react-bootstrap4-modal all have peer requirements on those, and the umbrella is what the consumer installs, so it has to forward them. (Same ranges litform-popovers already declares.)
• litform-modals: adds react-dom >= 18 as a peer (react-bootstrap4-modal 3 requires both; the package only declared react).
• Matching react-dom (and, for the umbrella, react and react-dom) devDependencies so the monorepo's own install satisfies the new peers, as litform-popovers already does.

No code changes. These are all dependencies the packages already needed; this only makes the manifests say so.

Test plan

• In a scratch consumer project, an install of the published 0.36.0 reproduces exactly the three complaints above; the same install with the umbrella and litform-modals replaced by packed builds of this branch reports none
• In this workspace, yarn explain peer-requirements no longer lists the umbrella or litform-modals react/react-dom complaints (the remaining ones are dev tooling: Storybook, @testing-library, etc.)
• ESLint clean; popovers and modals tests pass (30); litform and litform-modals build
• CI

A patch release (0.36.1) would deliver this.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UKBUsxCfYBKFsYKKgN8Fsz