-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
feat(integration,event_loop): add wasm / wasm-gc scheduler-only run_async_main shim #389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mizchi
wants to merge
2
commits into
moonbitlang:main
Choose a base branch
from
mizchi:pr-wasm-gc-shim
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -38,3 +38,12 @@ pub fn Timer::cancel(timer : Timer) -> Unit { | |
| ignore(timer) | ||
| abort("`Timer::cancel()` is unimplemented on WASM backend") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ///| | ||
| /// WASM stub for the scheduler-only `reschedule` entry point. Mirrors | ||
| /// the JS shim — no IO, just drains ready coroutines until none remain. | ||
| pub fn reschedule() -> Unit { | ||
| while !@coroutine.no_more_work() { | ||
| @coroutine.reschedule() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. inline this loop into call sites |
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
reschedule()loops until@coroutine.no_more_work()is true, butno_more_work()also depends on the internalblockingcounter. If a coroutine calls@coroutine.suspend()and no coroutine is ready (for example, waiting for an external callback or a deadlocked wait), this condition stays false while the ready queue is empty, so this loop becomes a tight CPU spin that never yields back to the host. On wasm/wasm-gc this can deadlock embedding scenarios the shim is meant to support, because the host event loop cannot run while this function is busy-looping.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, fixed in 4c1b564. Switched the guard from
!@coroutine.no_more_work()to@coroutine.has_immediately_ready_task()(=!scheduler.run_later.is_empty()). Now the loop drains only immediately-ready work; if all ready coroutines are processed and only blocked ones remain (e.g., suspended on an external host callback),reschedule()returns and yields back to the host. The host can re-enter viarun_async_mainwhen new work becomes available, mirroring the spirit of the JS shim (which delegates continuation toset_timeout(0, reschedule)).