Skip to content

fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp MONGOSH-3472#64

Merged
nbbeeken merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
bump-gyp
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp MONGOSH-3472#64
nbbeeken merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
bump-gyp

Conversation

@nbbeeken

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@nbbeeken nbbeeken changed the title fix: windows vs 2022 builds need newer node-gyp fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp Jun 30, 2026
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken marked this pull request as draft June 30, 2026 04:57
@nbbeeken nbbeeken changed the title fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp MONGOSH-3099 Jul 1, 2026
@nbbeeken nbbeeken changed the title fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp MONGOSH-3099 fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp Jul 1, 2026
@nbbeeken nbbeeken changed the title fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp fix: windows vs 2026 builds need newer node-gyp MONGOSH-3472 Jul 1, 2026
@mongodb-js mongodb-js deleted a comment from semgrep-code-mongodb Bot Jul 1, 2026
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2026 19:48
# Clang 22, which the libffi fix in nodejs/node#64222 addresses. That
# fix is on main but not yet in a v26.x release, so compile a main
# nightly that contains it to verify VS2026 works. Revert to a plain
# 26.x release once the fix lands in one.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we link a jira ticket here that requires to revert it to 26.x?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We usually put TODO(MONGOSH-3480) to comment block for visibility, not blocking for the merge.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#65

Yea I would've but the CI is a million years long haha. But the release came quick!

Comment thread resources/main-template.cc
Comment thread src/logger.ts
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken requested a review from alenakhineika July 7, 2026 15:18
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken merged commit 4a46994 into main Jul 8, 2026
54 of 58 checks passed
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken deleted the bump-gyp branch July 8, 2026 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants