Return time to care — without making clinical information less trustworthy.
CareOS is a clinician-first context, interoperability and assurance layer that sits beside existing hospital systems. It composes source-linked patient context and makes that context safely usable by people and bounded AI applications.
Clinical review demo → · One patient end to end → · Synthetic study →
Research / synthetic evaluation only · not for clinical use · no production write-back
Healthcare workers still act as human middleware between KIS/EHR, LIS, RIS/PACS, documents, ePA, calls and messages.
CareOS explores a stable layer above those systems rather than replacing them:
KIS / EHR · LIS · RIS/PACS · documents · ePA
↓
reusable adapters
↓
source-linked clinical context
identity · provenance · time · lifecycle · freshness
↓
role-specific UX + bounded agents/apps
↓
human authority
The north star is Time Returned to Care — safety gated.
- Clinical review — inspect changed, pending and critical context with sources attached.
- One patient journey — follow source → draft → outage → correction → recovery → human review.
- Synthetic paired-study surface — see how the project intends to measure time, errors and verification behaviour.
The intended question is not “is this a nice AI demo?” It is:
Can clinicians spend less time hunting, reconciling and copying information without losing provenance, uncertainty or control?
- Pending ≠ negative.
- Unavailable ≠ absent.
- Documented therapy ≠ AI recommendation.
- Agent draft ≠ source truth.
The model may propose structure. It does not become the authority that creates trusted clinical truth.
- source-linked clinical lifecycle and provenance
- patient-local graph + stale-artifact invalidation
- bounded agent/tool authority and adversarial scenarios
- NORMAL / DEGRADED / OFFLINE / RECOVERY states
- patient/family source-linked experience
- interactive human clinical review UX
- FHIR R4 research read path
- ISiK/FHIR-oriented validation path
- HL7 v2 ADT/ORU parsing for synthetic/deidentified inputs
- hospital manifest / preflight / review-pack tooling
- Docker/Helm deployment scaffold
- synthetic Time Returned to Care study machinery
untrusted model proposal
↓
deterministic Agent Gateway
patient · encounter · task · tools · operations · budgets
↓
trusted Tool Proxy
↓
source-linked result
↓
untrusted draft
↓
human review
The model cannot grant itself a new patient, tool, operation or effect authority.
The frozen 500-case synthetic clinical-truth holdout currently preserves precision/provenance but reaches only 26.32% recall with 100% review-case burden.
Therefore production G1 remains blocked.
That means CareOS should not be presented as clinically validated, production-ready or ready to make patient-care decisions. The next step is better external evidence, not stronger copy.
synthetic tests
↓
real clinicians on synthetic cases
↓
independent clinical / privacy / security / IT critique
↓
real non-secret hospital capability map
↓
approved vendor / deidentified sandbox
↓
governed shadow workflow
↓
bounded read-only pilot
↓
second hospital / second vendor
The first workflow to prove is physician morning review + documentation preparation.
A speed gain is not a win if source verification, error rate or safety gets worse.
| Path | Current state |
|---|---|
| FHIR R4 read | implemented research runtime |
| ISiK / FHIR read | runtime + validation path |
| HL7 v2 ADT/ORU parsing | synthetic/deidentified connector |
| Real HL7 v2 transport | external evidence required |
| Vendor API | contract only |
| Live transactional/write | blocked by release policy |
No named KIS/LIS compatibility claim is made without a real approved environment.
CareOS is not currently:
- clinically validated
- approved for identifiable patient-data production use
- proven to save clinician time
- proven interoperable with a named production KIS/LIS
- proven repeatable across hospitals
- regulatory approved/certified
- a 24/7 clinical service
- Release assurance
- Current status and gaps
- Claim → evidence matrix
- Production gates
- Agent security model
- Real-world proof campaign
- Clinical study protocol
Keep systems of record. Standardize trustworthy context above them.
Models may interpret and propose. Evidence, authority and safety boundaries remain outside the model.
Built by Michael Ninh in Berlin.