Repository navigation
Conversation
Author
|
Hello, It looks like both failures are coming from the CI environment rather than from this submission.
I ran the assertions from Please let me know if there is anything that needs to be done on my side. |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Benchmark submission: ALIGNN 2.0
Brief description of the algorithm
ALIGNN 2.0 (arXiv:2609.19487) is a pure-PyTorch reimplementation of the Atomistic Line Graph Neural Network. This submission covers the nine structure-based tasks of matbench_v0.1 with one fixed configuration across all tasks (hidden size 768, k-nearest-neighbour graph with 12 neighbours within 8 Å). Only the epoch budget varies, set in advance by dataset size. Relative to the original ALIGNN entry it improves dielectric, perovskites, log_kvrh, log_gvrh, mp_e_form and mp_gap, is within the fold-to-fold spread on jdft2d and phonons, and is lower on mp_is_metal. The four composition-only tasks are not applicable, since ALIGNN requires a crystal structure as input.
Included files
results.json.gz– predictions for all 5 folds of the 9 tasks, recorded withtask.recordand validated withMatbenchBenchmark.is_validinfo.json– algorithm description, references, requirements and notes (including a cross-cluster reproducibility check)make_matbench_dataset.py– pulls each fold through the matbench API and writes the training dataset and per-fold configcollect_matbench.py– maps each fold's predictions back to matbench test order and records themconfig_mb_base.json,config_mb_classification_example.json– the training configuration (regression, and the mp_is_metal variant)mb_train.sbatch– the Slurm script that trains one foldCould a maintainer please add the
new_benchmarklabel?