Add types for read_yolo_label_file.py

[yashkuceriya]

Summary

Remove read_yolo_label_file.py from the mypy exclusion list. The file is already fully annotated, so this brings it under continuous type checking and prevents future type regressions.

Part of #1635.

Checks

• mypy 1.4.1 lightly/utils/cropping/read_yolo_label_file.py
• ruff 0.12.7 check lightly tests
• ruff 0.12.7 format --check lightly tests
• git diff --check

Removes read_yolo_label_file.py from the mypy exclusion list. This adds continuous type-checking coverage for the file.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 32e8f15b-5a01-4b96-b693-5591247ffdc2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8d317f and d70c2b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pyproject.toml

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• pyproject.toml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The mypy configuration no longer excludes lightly/utils/cropping/read_yolo_label_file.py. Mypy will now type-check this file.

Changes

Mypy coverage update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Enable YOLO label type checking pyproject.toml	The mypy exclusion list no longer contains the YOLO label reader path.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d70c2

This narrowly enables continuous type checking for an already annotated file and introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk beyond normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title identifies the correct file and the type-checking change. It is slightly imprecise because the pull request enables mypy checking rather than adding type annotations.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}