Skip to content

feat: handle missing controller socket - #144

Open
SimonRichardson wants to merge 1 commit into
juju:mainfrom
SimonRichardson:retry-on-socket-failure
Open

feat: handle missing controller socket#144
SimonRichardson wants to merge 1 commit into
juju:mainfrom
SimonRichardson:retry-on-socket-failure

Conversation

@SimonRichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The config change socket will be guaranteed to be there by the very nature of Juju - it has no blocking dependencies upon creation. That can't be said about the controlsocket, which requires the dependency engine to be up. In this instance, we have no recourse to resolve this, other than retrying. It's a shame we can't have another way to approach this.

The config change socket will be guaranteed to be there by the very
nature of Juju - it has no blocking dependencies upon creation. That
can't be said about the controlsocket, which requires the dependency
engine to be up. In this instance, we have no recourse to resolve this,
other than retrying. It's a shame we can't have another way to approach
this.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant