Skip to content

Use ruff select instead of extend-select to keep the rule set explicit #6964

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
albertvillanova merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

Use ruff select instead of extend-select to keep the rule set explicit #6964

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion pyproject.toml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -159,7 +159,9 @@ ignore = [
"C901", # function complexity
"E501",
]
extend-select = ["E", "F", "I", "W", "UP", "B", "T", "C"]
# `select`, not `extend-select`: the rule set is explicit, so a ruff release that expands its default
# selection (0.16 raised the defaults from 59 to 413 rules) does not silently enable new rules.
select = ["E", "F", "I", "W", "UP", "B", "T", "C"]

[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores]
# Allow prints in auxiliary scripts
Expand Down
Loading