docs: raise synthetic process ceiling to 60 with buffer - #131
Conversation
Remaining Slice Launch-to-Evidence Allocation ProposalNoncanonical Issue #108 planning, September 13, 2026. Baseline: accepted target Recommendation and ArithmeticThe complete selected plan needs 11 new synthetic process units, giving a proposed
This is the smallest complete allocation selected here that retains the existing Forty cannot accommodate even the unchanged four host launches plus the two independent The required decision before the host process supplement freezes is to accept a complete Fixed Future Request MapEach numbered row below is one process reservation and one authentication request in
A-DUPLICATE and A-UNKNOWN supply an ordinary failure result across WSL, not a validated A-PRECLOSED requires a separate process: preclosed admission and pending interaction are WSL Topology and Required Ownership EvidenceThe direct caller path must be Linux caller -> WSL executable interoperability -> For W-PENDING, the Linux caller creates the lifetime pipe, keeps its sole writer, and For W-DEATH, a surviving Linux supervisor starts the actual caller as a distinct process. For A-DUPLICATE/A-UNKNOWN/A-PRECLOSED, the actual Linux caller waits for the unmodified The exact future protocol must bind the finite Linux caller/supervisor and existing Native AOT and Effects PrerequisitesUse one selected final production publish for A-DUPLICATE through A-INCOMPATIBLE and the The current scenario runner is managed and does not select Native AOT. Do not casually Before A-MISSING/A-INCOMPATIBLE can execute credential-free, source/artifact review must Separate Accounting and Remaining Real Evidence
The complete selected acceptance path is therefore 47 cumulative synthetic process Authorities and Reused PlansAll canonical references mean the fixed target above:
|
Independent Review of the Synthetic Process Capacity ProposalNo material findings. The exact local Wave-only proposal is coherent and ready for the repository owner's numeric-scope decision. It is not accepted work authorization, an accepted protocol, execution admission, or a completed Record-System Gate. The current accepted maximum remains 40 until a reviewed amendment merges. Review Subject and IndependenceReviewer:
Accepted target versions of AGENTS, the Delivery Wave, governance and record-system policies, controls, record families, operational identities, experiment safety, rechecks, Windows design, validation strategy and Slice protocol govern this assessment. The accepted The exclusive sealed identity audit is Evidence and AllocationThe proposal rationale is
The eleven additional selected launches exceed the preserved 36-unit allocation by eleven; four fit the existing Wave margin and seven require the proposed increase. The distinct failure causes and staged host reachability explain why the selected plan does not combine these cases. This is a defensible minimum for the fixed selected plan, not a universal mathematical minimum or a guarantee that the Slice can be accepted within 47. There is no exploratory, corrective-runtime or retry allowance. Failed and interrupted starts stay charged. The 24 consumed units are the sealed planning input. This review does not claim a fresh execution-history audit; every actual admission must recover current consumption. The pending adapter test 0018 uses no synthetic-process units and does not depend on this increase. Neither its running evidence nor its outcome was inspected for this report. The retained current protocol still allocates 36 process units through three complete 12-unit reservations. Its references to the earlier 40-unit Wave envelope do not enlarge that exact allocation. Merging this numeric amendment alone cannot allocate the additional cases, authorize use of previously unallocated capacity, change controllers or revise per-action bounds. A later independently accepted exact protocol amendment must reconcile its allocation arithmetic with the then-current Wave before any additional case is admitted. Research-Evidence and Effects ReviewThe numeric rationale is an arithmetic inference from a fixed planning allocation. It is not a new public-source finding, runtime observation, platform claim or completed-acceptance claim. No source/assertion is promoted into a support promise. The proposal leaves .NET SDK 10.0.401/runtime 10.0.12, MSAL/Broker 4.83.1 and NativeInterop 0.20.3 unchanged. The credential-free boundary, dedicated roots, permitted hosts, public dependency sources, download ceiling, retained-history rules, account exclusions and other cumulative ceilings remain byte-identical. No account enumeration, token acquisition, real WAM interaction, credential-bearing state, consent/cache change, authenticated resource request, installation, distribution, signing or release is granted. The selected real-account batch remains a separate proposal of at most twelve launches; no real-account authority or spare synthetic capacity follows from it. The allocation correctly retains the following dependent obligations:
These are preserved prerequisites, not hidden completion claims or defects in the numeric-only proposal. Recheck Registry Fallback: All Nine EntriesThe merged-Wave fallback event requires evaluating every registry entry. It does not itself fire every typed decision/workstream/release trigger or demand an unrelated source refresh. This review evaluated all nine entries against this exact capacity-only diff and its rationale. The proposed increase does not select a new mechanism, WSL model, publishing mode, account contract, Profile, cache fallback or provider mapping, and is not a release. No new mutable public fact is asserted here. Therefore no additional source refresh or downstream canonical change is required by this numeric edit alone.
The current design, validation, research and compatibility consumers need no changed conclusion from the numeric edit. Each later concrete trigger must be evaluated on its own current subject and target; this proposal cannot prospectively discharge it. Refresh these dispositions if the Wave proposal, relied-on authorities or target materially changes before acceptance. Record-System, Controls and Governance FallbackThe only changed record belongs to the existing GOV-001 through GOV-010 remain satisfied for this proposal: a concrete capacity shortage has a real consumer; authority stays singular; one scalar change is the minimum mechanism; the owner's scope/risk/acceptance judgment is not automated; controls continue implementing accepted policy; no affected schema/interface migration is needed; scheduled triggers remain defined; merge alone changes accepted state; history and rationale stay in Git/PR carriers; and required evidence remains attached to the applicable carrier. GOV-011 remains applicable to any later material finding. This review has no material finding requiring independent triage. The governance-system fallback found no missing or duplicated authority, repeated exception requiring policy redesign, policy/control contradiction, broken consumer, or disproportionate governance mechanism caused by this edit. No governance amendment or separate canonical fallback report is required. This temporary report supplies review evidence for the eventual governing PR and is not a new repository record family or authorization ledger. The scheduled The operational identity registry was evaluated. No distribution, persistent-configuration/cache, coordination, telemetry, signing or update-channel selection is introduced. The already accepted managed HTTP identity is unchanged and retains its separate collision-test and networked-implementation prerequisites. No upstream identity is newly selected or consumed. Controls routed here are the existing deterministic hk checks, independent record-system review, independent research-evidence review, recheck fallback and owner-disposition Record-System Gate. Their producer/consumer/use points remain intact. Mechanical checks do not decide whether 47 is valuable, sufficient in all eventualities, or an acceptable owner scope choice. Mechanical Evidence and Remaining Owner DecisionThe parent reported collecting hk session 84936 with exit 0, including 32 passing The concrete remaining owner decision is whether to approve this exact seven-unit increase, accepting a cumulative ceiling of 47 for the reviewed fixed synthetic plan, or choose a different evidence plan. That decision has not been requested or granted at this report point. Any eventual PR must carry the proposal rationale, required contextual/mechanical results and the owner's explicit disposition. Its applicable CI and merge checks must pass on the final reviewable subject. Under the Research-evidence review result: No material findings. Record-system review result: No material findings. Governance and all-registry fallback review result: No material findings. Only exclusive temporary review artifacts were written. No repository, protocol, source, experiment root, capacity record or execution evidence was modified; no SDK, subject, helper main, native library or authentication was executed; no mutable 0018 evidence was read; and no publication, PR creation, merge or enlarged execution occurred in this review. |
Independent PR #131 review refreshed to target480aNo material findings. Reviewer: Exact proposal and current authority
The accepted Wave-only preparation/review path permits consideration of this bounded The previous complete review at Intervening changes and their effectThe target advanced through accepted PR #130 controlled-adapter source/evidence and The added adapter source/tests and H controller support do not change the one-number The accepted adapter0018 record retains 24 process reservations; the separately reviewed Finite allocation and retained effects boundary
The sum remains The existing protocol still allocates 36 process units. A merged 47-unit Wave would The numeric change preserves the credential-free boundary, designated hosts, public All nine recheck entries on the current targetThe merged-Wave fallback evaluates all registry entries; it does not automatically fire
No new typed trigger fires solely because of this diff. No downstream research, design, Record-system, control and governance fallbackThe sole changed record remains in the existing Current routed hk and independent review controls retain their policy, producer, The governance fallback reveals no duplicated/missing authority, policy/control conflict, Mechanical evidence and remaining decisionExact-head CI run 34770166658 remains completed/success at The remaining concrete owner decision is whether to accept the exact seven-unit increase Sealed audit: |
Raise the proposed cumulative process ceiling from 40 to 47 for the reviewed finite host, WSL and final-artifact plan. Preserve consumed reservations, the final unchanged CLI batch, and the credential-free effects boundary. Refs: #108
hcoona
changed the title
Apply the owner-selected ceiling for the fixed 47-unit acceptance plan and 13 units of unallocated buffer. Preserve all existing effects, protocol allocation, previous charges and the final unchanged CLI regression. Refs: #108
506f797 to
23c9d80
Compare
Independent PR #131 review: synthetic ceiling 60No material findings. Reviewer: This is a completed contextual review with CI still pending at sealing. It is not permission to execute H test0022, use unallocated capacity, migrate a retained controller, or merge before required checks finish. The repository owner has already selected 60 and authorized merge after checks and review; no repeated numerical decision is requested. Exact source and current authority
The complete candidate net diff is one insertion and one deletion in Accepted target versions of AGENTS, governance/record policies, family/control catalogs, experiment safety, the recheck registry, operational identities, Windows design, security, validation, the current execution protocol, and both applicable review Skills govern this review. The owner-approved Wave-only preparation/review path permits this proposal; before merge the current outer process ceiling remains 40. Current-target impact and orderingBetween the tested source base and current target, only PR #134's three accepted design/security/validation documents changed. Independent per-file comparison of 17 authority/helper files confirms no change to Wave, protocol, helper bytes, governance, routing, identities, or rechecks. The target's complete tree matches the independently reviewed PR #134 tree. PR #134 was accepted with its disclosed unresolved first CI failure, independent triage, unchanged successful diagnostic rerun, and explicit owner disposition at #134 (comment). This review preserves that limitation; it neither repairs nor dismisses the first failure. Its independent design review is #134 (comment). The accepted local host-admission predicates apply before real provider initialization and at real-provider UI effects. They explicitly do not require a synthetic provider to query real logon metadata merely to exercise the owned window. They add separate provider/native/normal-host evidence obligations without allocating a new process case. The one-number Wave proposal conflicts with none of those obligations. Absorbing these three documentation changes into the already tested proposal source is not required for this merge; this report evaluates their effect against the current target. Safe ordering is therefore: retain the already accepted PR #134; finish PR #131's required exact-head checks and merge its reviewed sole numeric change; then independently accept the separate protocol/helper refresh before any dependent H execution. A new target argument alone cannot satisfy the existing Wave gate. Capacity and effects
The arithmetic is The exact accepted execution protocol still allocates 36 process units, including the final 12-unit CLI batch. The Wave number alone does not allocate the eleven additional fixed-plan starts or any of the buffer. Each concrete additional case, correction, or retry needs a finite independently accepted protocol supplement and source/artifact admission inside the accepted envelope. The buffer grants no arbitrary test, automatic retry, new effects, or additional workstream. H itself uses zero synthetic process units and one build/test action. All other ceilings remain unchanged: 16 dependency preparation/restore actions, 120 build/test actions, 12 Native AOT publish actions, and at most 4 GiB of newly downloaded public dependency content. The existing Windows preparation allocation remains 5/5; process headroom supplies no restore capacity. Dedicated roots, verified installed toolchains/caches, pinned public dependencies, retention, and all per-action termination controls remain required. The unchanged credential-free boundary still excludes account enumeration, token acquisition, account/cache/consent changes, authenticated resource requests and real WAM interaction. Local-logon metadata, actual broker behavior, selected-account work, installation, signing, release, and broader support claims retain their separate authorities and gates. A larger synthetic ceiling does not supply that evidence or make the overall Slice accepted. Protocol and retained-controller consequenceThe current protocol explicitly stops its helpers when the accepted Wave changes until protocol and gate evidence are refreshed. Both There is a second dependency: The later amendment therefore needs a bounded exact-hash retained-wrapper transition, not just two new Wave constants. Its accepted protocol and independently admitted action must bind old/new wrapper identities, finite history, exclusive backup and migration evidence, and fail on absent, changed or partial evidence. It must not permit standalone replacement, generic upgrades, history reset, or implicit retries. That future amendment remains unreviewed here; this prerequisite analysis is not authorization to mutate the retained file. The existing H source/build and fixed 15-case synthetic selection can be considered for explicit reuse against the accepted design. A rebuild or repeated inert-red run is not inherently required solely by these documentation/Wave/helper changes. Reuse still needs renewed target/protocol/source/artifact/history and protected-input-map admission; fresh operator readiness comes only after that preparation. H remains paused. All nine rechecksThe merged-Wave fallback evaluates every registry entry. It does not itself fire every typed decision, workstream, or release trigger. This numeric change makes no new mutable-source claim and selects no different mechanism, Profile, account contract, cache design, WSL model, publishing mode or failure mapping.
No typed trigger fires solely from this diff. No current research or design conclusion needs alteration because of the number. Future concrete triggers retain their required outcomes; this review does not prospectively discharge WSL, Profile, publishing, mapping, or release reviews. Record-system and governance fallbackOnly the existing No new record family, control, schema, root, identity, public contract, navigation path, lifecycle semantics, support promise or upstream import is introduced. There is no duplicate authorization ledger. The scheduled validation-cases family does not activate merely because the number changes: the current validation strategy and Slice protocol already own the relevant scenario and execution concerns. The controls retain their declared producers, consumers, execution points and policy relationships. The exact-Wave helper stop is a deliberate dependency gate, not an expanded execution grant or conflicting second capacity authority. Updating its binding through a later accepted amendment preserves a valid stopped state after this merge; no existing consumer is silently allowed to use the new ceiling. The governance fallback identifies no missing/duplicated authority, policy-control contradiction, recurring exception, unmanaged consumer or disproportionate new mechanism from this diff. No new governance record or mechanical check is needed. Contextual evidence remains distinct from hk's deterministic checks. GOV-011 continues to apply to any later material finding; this review identifies none requiring triage. The numerical owner decision and rationale are already recorded in the carrier and are not supplied by this reviewer. Mechanical evidence and remaining CI conditionThe author reports full local hk session 75444 and commit-hook session 53270 fully collected with exit 0 and all 32 conformance groups passing for the revised source. This reviewer did not rerun those checks or execute a subject. Independent Git inspection verifies the final source tree, clean worktree, commit message/body/footer, sole net diff and exact Wave bytes; GitHub GET verifies the same PR head and current target. GitHub CI run https://github.com/hcoona/microsoft-authentication-cli/actions/runs/34786205953, attempt 1, is bound to exact head Subject to successful completion and recording of required checks, no independent contextual-review condition blocks applying the owner's already authorized exact Wave change. The owner remains the Record-System Gate decision maker. This report supplies no execution or attending-operator admission. Sealed supporting artifacts
Only exclusive temporary reviewer artifacts were written and sealed read-only. No repository/source/protocol/experiment evidence was changed, no SDK/helper/native/account operation ran, and no readiness question, publication, merge or H execution occurred in this review. |
1 participant
Summary
Raise the cumulative synthetic process-scenario ceiling from 40 to 60 for the first Windows authentication Slice. The repository owner selected 60 to retain a buffer beyond the fixed 47-unit plan.
Authorization and Scope
Issue #108 coordinates the first Slice. The owner explicitly approves this numerical change and its merge after required checks and review. This proposal uses the accepted Wave-only preparation path and changes only
docs/delivery-wave.md, with tested source base480a9b98f9b12c6011fa6c8e2af0e55a70e7d03a. The current reviewed merge target is0079bfc77e149d21d20b874851478051f97c3c88, which adds only the three accepted PR #134 design/security/validation documents. Its Wave, helpers, governance and recheck registry are unchanged. The proposal does not authorize enlarged execution before merge.Allocation and Owner Rationale
The ceiling increases by 20 from the accepted 40. The 13-unit buffer is headroom for later separately specified corrective or additional necessary synthetic validation within this Slice. It does not allocate an arbitrary test, automatic retry, new effects or another workstream. Failed and interrupted starts remain charged; previous consumption is not reset. The exact execution protocol still allocates 36 units, including the preserved final CLI batch. Further cases or uses of the buffer require a finite independently accepted protocol supplement and source/artifact admission.
Record and Effects Boundaries
Only the existing delivery-wave family changes. Proposed Wave blob:
956aebe0e19cce7dbd08dcaa7fe83a9ef9e01f7c. All other ceilings and the credential-free synthetic effects boundary remain unchanged. Real account, WAM, cache, consent, installation and release gates remain in their existing authorities. Windows preparation remains at its existing 5/5 protocol allocation; process headroom does not add restore capacity.The current helpers bind the exact accepted Wave blob. After this merge they stop until a separately reviewed and accepted protocol/helper refresh binds the new blob; this PR does not weaken that guard. The pending H suite adds zero process units and retains its separate actual-artifact, current-authority and attending-operator gates.
Validation and Review
The prior 47-unit head and its reviews remain historical evidence. This revised 60-unit head receives fresh full local hk, commit hooks, exact-source CI, and independent record-system/research-evidence review including governance fallback and all nine recheck evaluations. The final source is
23c9d80d96f47600b39c077b9359acb0598b8954, tree0582b6b0b3bf935f1180b2011173a126907a6071; full local hk and commit hooks both passed, including all 32 conformance groups. Exact-source CI, attempt 1, completed successfully. The independent review found no material findings; its complete published body was independently verified. Reviewer/root/wave_reviewseparately verified the completed CI, exact head/tree, unchanged current target and clean mergeability, satisfying the report's pending-CI condition. The owner-selected numerical change and merge authorization are ready to apply.The owner has supplied the numerical decision and rationale: use 60 to retain a finite buffer. Required checks and contextual review still determine readiness to apply that authorized change. No new family, control, schema, identity, public contract, product behavior or upstream import is proposed.
Refs: #108