Repository navigation
docs(roadmap): session handoff — single-trunk consolidation + widened bug-fix pass (main=v0.2.6) - #21
ChrisBeWithYou wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
… bug-fix pass (main=v0.2.6) Fresh STOPPED HERE for 2026-07-16: virtuoso-dev deleted, main is the single trunk at v0.2.6; PRs #4/#15/#16/#3/#17/#19/#20 landed; coach-loop bug fixed + regression-guarded; jam/ear + grading/host-sync audited clean. Only open thread is Issue #18 (Byron's call on deleting the redundant feat/gold-improv-verifier branch). Demoted the stale 2026-06-26 STOPPED HERE to "Previous session". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MS2YFb6UUSwJVV6CmEa25i
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 38 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughROADMAP.md replaces the previous status entry with a July 16, 2026 update covering single-trunk consolidation, merged changes, bug-hunt results, the remaining open issue, known smoke failures, and launch-readiness follow-ups. ChangesRoadmap status
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@ROADMAP.md`:
- Line 134: Reconcile the `backing-engine` classification between the earlier
ROADMAP entry and the updated “Known pre-existing smoke reds” entry. Verify its
actual solo and parallel behavior, then either classify it consistently with the
evidence or document the evidence supporting the changed classification; update
the affected ROADMAP references accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
1 participant
Session-end handoff. Fresh STOPPED HERE (2026-07-16):
virtuoso-devdeleted,mainis the single trunk at v0.2.6; PRs #4/#15/#16/#3/#17/#19/#20 landed; coach-loop bug fixed + regression-guarded; jam/ear + grading/host-sync audited clean. Only open thread: Issue #18 (Byron's call on the redundantfeat/gold-improv-verifierbranch). Docs-only.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit