-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
Fix permanent shard loss when RevokeShards times out #3766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Aditya1404Sal
wants to merge
3
commits into
golemcloud:main
Choose a base branch
from
Aditya1404Sal:fix/revoke-shards-background-drain
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b292958
Fix permanent shard loss when RevokeShards times out: drain in backgr…
Aditya1404Sal 6f436a1
Keep RevokeShards synchronous: signal all lost agents at once, wait u…
Aditya1404Sal 11a3064
Address review findings: wait for in-flight creations in the drain, r…
Aditya1404Sal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
P1: Do not rebalance shards whose authoritative reconciliation failed
Retrying this
SetShardAssignmentafter the rebalance does not resolve the ownership uncertainty. IfAssign(B, {5})was applied but timed out, the same-pass reconciliation failed, and this pre-rebalance reconciliation also fails, B may still own shard 5. The code nevertheless proceeds toexecute_rebalance, which can assign shard 5 to A before any successfulSet(B, ...).vigoo reproduced that sequence deterministically: A received shard 5 while B’s local assignment still contained shard 5. Please keep these in-doubt shards unassigned/suppress their reassignment until the authoritative
Setsucceeds, unless an atomic ownership epoch makes stale-owner writes impossible.