Skip to content

docs: TUI status strip, log panel, and export design spec#15

Merged
bschellenberger2600 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
design/tui-status-log-export-spec
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

docs: TUI status strip, log panel, and export design spec#15
bschellenberger2600 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
design/tui-status-log-export-spec

Conversation

@bschellenberger2600

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Adds a design spec for TUI status strip, log panel, and session export parity with git-fire
  • Defines the JSONL LogEntry session contract, event-driven status strip, ring-buffer log panel, and user-initiated export paths
  • Preserves the mandatory TUI-then-CLI split (runRainTUIStreamrunRainOnRepos) for post-selection fetch/sync work

Test plan

  • Review design doc for alignment with git-fire cross-reference spec
  • Confirm TUI-then-CLI requirement matches current cmd/root.go behavior
  • No code changes in this PR — implementation follows in a separate branch

Made with Cursor

Match git-fire design: JSONL session contract, event-driven status,
log panel/export, and mandatory TUI-then-CLI split (runRainTUIStream
to runRainOnRepos).

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@bschellenberger2600, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 59 minutes and 26 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5a8c8811-3dd2-42e2-9618-9ce671d52a54

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d29d11 and ee01295.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .cursor/BUGBOT.md
  • docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-19-tui-status-log-export-design.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch design/tui-status-log-export-spec

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Policy now lives in AGENTS.md after #12; drop duplicate .cursor/BUGBOT.md.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not approving: Cursor Bugbot completed successfully, but no Cursor[bot] PR review comment with the required signal was found on this PR. Human review is needed before merge. No additional reviewers were assigned (solo maintainer repo).

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did not approve: Cursor Bugbot completed successfully but no Cursor[bot] review comment with the expected signal was posted on this PR. Human maintainer review is still appropriate for this design spec; no additional reviewers were assigned (solo maintainer repository).

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved: Cursor Bugbot passed with no findings on this documentation-only PR. No additional reviewers were assigned.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver

@bschellenberger2600
bschellenberger2600 merged commit 3af70fd into main Jun 17, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant