docs: fix CoC contact link and CNCF name in CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md - #2251
Merged
John15321 merged 1 commit intoJul 31, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Priyanshubhartistm <bhartipriyanshustm@gmail.com>
John15321
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md had two small but real problems in its contact line:
private Maintainer mailing listlink was missing themailto:scheme, so instead of opening an email client it rendered as a broken/relative link. This is the same bug that was just fixed in governance.md (docs: fix broken maintainer mailing list links in governance.md #2244) - just in a different file.What changed
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: addedmailto:to the maintainer mailing list link, and corrected "Cloud Native Foundation" to "Cloud Native Computing Foundation".Open question / not addressed here
While looking at this I noticed the three docs that describe how to report a CoC violation each name a different secondary contact:
I don't know which of these is actually current/correct, so I'm not guessing at a reconciliation here - this PR only fixes the mechanical link/name issues. Flagging in case a maintainer wants to pick one canonical contact path across all three files as a follow-up.