-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
docs: Add AI SDLC / SpecKit tooling evaluation comparison matrix (Iss… #3140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
aryansingh0012
wants to merge
3
commits into
eclipse-score:main
Choose a base branch
from
aryansingh0012:feature/add-tooling-comparison-matrix
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+583
−0
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ | ||
| .. | ||
| Copyright (c) 2026 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation | ||
|
|
||
| See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional | ||
| information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
|
|
||
| This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the | ||
| terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at | ||
| https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
|
|
||
| SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
|
|
||
| DR-009-Infra: AI Agent Context Packaging Tooling Selection | ||
| ========================================================== | ||
|
|
||
| - **Date:** 2026-07-31 | ||
| - **Issue:** `#3115 <https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/issues/3115>`_ | ||
|
|
||
| .. dec_rec:: AI Agent Context Packaging Tooling Selection | ||
| :id: dec_rec__infra__ai_packaging_tooling | ||
| :status: proposed | ||
| :version: 1 | ||
| :context: Infrastructure | ||
| :decision: APM is the primary AI agent context packaging tool; Lola is the fallback; OKIT is not recommended | ||
|
|
||
| Context / Problem | ||
| ----------------- | ||
|
|
||
| S-CORE contributors use multiple AI coding assistants (GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, etc.). | ||
| Agent context — skills, instructions, prompts, MCP server references — is today copy-pasted per | ||
| repository and per tool, unversioned and unaudited. | ||
|
|
||
| A packaging layer is needed that: | ||
|
|
||
| - Distributes agent context declaratively and reproducibly across all contributors regardless of IDE. | ||
| - Provides supply-chain controls (lockfile integrity, SBOM, policy allow-lists) consistent with | ||
| S-CORE's existing ``sbom-tool`` and safety-oriented process. | ||
| - Integrates with CI as a merge gate (audit, drift detection). | ||
|
|
||
| Visual Overview | ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
|
|
||
| .. mermaid:: | ||
|
|
||
| flowchart LR | ||
| subgraph Sources["Package Sources (git / marketplace)"] | ||
| R1[eclipse-score/mcp-servers] | ||
| R2[eclipse-score/tooling] | ||
| R3[community skills repos] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph PM["Package Manager (one of three)"] | ||
| APM["APM\napm.yml + apm.lock.yaml\npolicy · SBOM · hashes"] | ||
| Lola["Lola\n.lola-req\nno lockfile hashes"] | ||
| OKIT["OKIT\nflat copy\nno versioning"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph Out["Per-Contributor Output"] | ||
| C1[".github/copilot-instructions.md"] | ||
| C2["CLAUDE.md"] | ||
| C3[".cursor/rules"] | ||
| C4["...other IDE configs"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| Sources --> APM | ||
| Sources --> Lola | ||
| Sources --> OKIT | ||
| APM --> Out | ||
| Lola --> Out | ||
| OKIT --> Out | ||
|
|
||
| Options Considered | ||
| ------------------ | ||
|
|
||
| APM — ``microsoft/apm`` | ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
|
|
||
| Manifest + lockfile package manager for AI agent context (instructions, skills, prompts, hooks, | ||
| plugins, MCP servers) across 8 coding assistants. Uses ``apm.yml`` manifest and ``apm.lock.yaml`` | ||
| lockfile with content hashes. | ||
|
|
||
| **Pros:** | ||
|
|
||
| - Policy engine (``apm-policy.yml``): org-level allow-lists, tighten-only inheritance, CI audit gates. | ||
| - Lockfile with content hashes; ``apm.lock export --format cyclonedx|spdx`` SBOM export. | ||
| - Content-security scanning (hidden-Unicode / prompt-injection detection on install). | ||
| - Broadest agent coverage: 8 assistants (Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Codex, Gemini, Windsurf, Kiro). | ||
| - Drift detection; active Microsoft-org project (3.3k stars, 71 releases). | ||
| - Directly complements ``eclipse-score/mcp-servers`` and ``sbom-tool``. | ||
|
|
||
| **Cons:** | ||
|
|
||
| - Newest governance/policy features are the least battle-tested part of the tool. | ||
| - Single-vendor stewardship (Microsoft) even though built on open standards. | ||
| - Adds a new onboarding step for contributors. | ||
|
|
||
| Lola — ``LobsterTrap/lola`` | ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
|
|
||
| Lighter, community-governed AI skill/context package manager (Go+Python) with marketplace-based | ||
| distribution. Declarative ``.lola-req`` file (pip-requirements style). | ||
|
|
||
| **Pros:** | ||
|
|
||
| - Simpler mental model; lower adoption barrier. | ||
| - Vendor-neutral governance (GOVERNANCE.md, OpenSSF Best Practices badge). | ||
| - Covers 6 assistants (Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Copilot VS Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode). | ||
|
|
||
| **Cons:** | ||
|
|
||
| - No lockfile content-hash integrity, no policy enforcement, no SBOM, no content-security scanning. | ||
| - Narrower agent coverage than APM (6 vs. 8). | ||
| - Smaller community (109 stars, 8 releases); missing enterprise governance features. | ||
|
|
||
| OKIT — ``Mumme-IT/okit`` | ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
|
|
||
| Minimal, dependency-free (stdlib-only) Python CLI: clones a repo, copies ``skills/`` and ``agents/`` | ||
| files into whichever tool directories are detected on ``PATH``. | ||
|
|
||
| **Pros:** | ||
|
|
||
| - Zero dependencies; trivially auditable codebase. | ||
| - Very low learning curve (three commands). | ||
|
|
||
| **Cons:** | ||
|
|
||
| - No dependency resolution, versioning, lockfile, policy enforcement, or content-security scanning. | ||
| - Single contributor (1 star, 1 fork, 40 commits, no releases); bus factor of one. | ||
| - Not defensible as shared infrastructure for a multi-org Eclipse project. | ||
|
|
||
| Conclusion | ||
| ---------- | ||
|
|
||
| **Primary: APM.** It is the only candidate with an actual governance and supply-chain-security | ||
| model (policy enforcement, lockfile integrity hashes, SBOM export, drift detection, content-security | ||
| scanning) — essential when agent context is executable-in-effect and S-CORE is a safety-relevant | ||
| open-source project accepting third-party contributions. | ||
|
|
||
| **Fallback: Lola.** Kept on the radar as a lighter-weight, vendor-neutral alternative if APM's | ||
| Microsoft stewardship or scope becomes a concern for Eclipse Foundation governance. | ||
|
|
||
| **Not recommended: OKIT.** Pre-production maturity (bus factor 1, no governance). Revisit if the | ||
| project matures significantly. | ||
|
|
||
| .. list-table:: | ||
| :header-rows: 1 | ||
| :widths: 10 15 30 | ||
|
|
||
| * - Tool | ||
| - S-CORE Fit | ||
| - Recommendation | ||
| * - APM | ||
| - High | ||
| - **USE** — primary packaging tool | ||
| * - Lola | ||
| - Medium | ||
| - **WATCH** — fallback only | ||
| * - OKIT | ||
| - Low | ||
| - **DO NOT USE** at this maturity | ||
|
|
||
| .. note:: | ||
|
|
||
| Status remains **proposed** until a proof-of-concept pilot validates integration with | ||
| S-CORE's Bazel/Sphinx/sphinx-needs infrastructure and CI pipeline. | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case I would wait with the DR until this PoC is setup. We should only merge decisions where we know that the implementation is technically feasible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @qor-lb ,
APM is pinned and supported tool for s-core DevContainer ecosystem.
Created separate pr #3188