chore: Update pr-title.yml

[rachelauryn]

Description

added 3 missing types from DK's change management list to pr title validation job

Deployment Readiness*

ready

Testing

just changed names on list - not needed

Describe or check:

• Created or updated unit, feature, and/or integration tests
• Typical manual testing in the local env browser, dev pipeline, etc.

Deployment Notes

Describe or check:

• No special deployment steps required

Rollback Plan

Describe or check:

• Standard revert is sufficient (git revert)

Reviewer Guidance / Questions*

Screenshots / Testing Evidence*

SOC 2 Change Management Checklist

• None of the below are true in this code
• New roles/permissions are introduced without review and approval by the product manager
• Hardcoded credentials, secrets, or API keys are present in this code
• Secrets are being managed outside of the approved secrets management process (e.g., GitHub Secrets, environment variables)
• PII or sensitive data handling is introduced or changed without being reviewed against our data classification policy
• Sensitive data is written to logs
• Input validation and sanitization is missing
• An unnecessary attack surface has been introduced (e.g., unused endpoints, open ports, debug modes left enabled)
• Common vulnerabilities have been introduced in the code (inc. any dependencies added or updated)
• No review for common vulnerabilities has been conducted
• Not tested in a non-production environment
• Breaking changes to existing APIs or integrations with downstream consumers being notified
• Performance impact has not been considered or acceptable
• Appropriate audit logging is missing for any security-relevant actions introduced by this change
• Log entries contain sensitive or PII data
• All existing tests do not pass locally (./vendor/bin/pest)

Provide justification if you are submitting a PR with any boxes checked other than the first.

---

Reminder for Reviewers: By approving this PR you are confirming that you have reviewed the code for correctness, security, and compliance with our engineering and SOC 2 standards. Do not approve PRs where SOC 2 checklist items are checked without documented justification.

*Optional

[mrmaloof]

@rachelauryn I'm hoping to get rid of this file in favor of centralizing this in datakind/.github. I made a PR for your review. Then we can be DRY and have SSoT for things like this.

security - I think this is good

I'm less convinced with infra and enhance.

• infra - I think ci, build, and chore can cover these change types.
• enhance - I think feat, refactor, fix, and perf would cover these changes.

What problems are we trying to solve with these change types? I could be convinced.

[rachelauryn]

closing as we discussed & Bill's idea above is by far the better solution!