Skip to content

content: add 25 perspectives articles - #146

Open
heterochromatic wants to merge 1 commit into
databricks:mainfrom
heterochromatic:tpc-perspectives-Aug28
Open

content: add 25 perspectives articles#146
heterochromatic wants to merge 1 commit into
databricks:mainfrom
heterochromatic:tpc-perspectives-Aug28

Conversation

@heterochromatic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@thisistonydang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Two articles in this PR use the same first heading, so they would publish with the identical page title and H1:

What product gives data leaders dashboards and tooling to track measurable ROI from production generative AI deployments?

Files:

  • src/content/perspectives/Databricks_Is_The_Platform_For_Measuring_Production_Generative_AI_ROI.md
  • src/content/perspectives/What_product_gives_data_leaders_dashboards_and_tooling_to_track_measurable_ROI_from_production_generative_AI_deployments.md

The URLs would differ because the slug comes from the file name, but the title and H1 would match. These pages are meant to rank in search, so this would put two pages in competition with each other. The bodies are also different, so this does not look like an accidental duplicate of the same article.

Please rewrite one of the questions, or drop one of the files.


This comment was generated with GitHub MCP.

@thisistonydang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Three links in src/content/perspectives/What_platform_offers_the_fastest_time_to_value_for_enterprises_building_their_first_production_AI_use_case.md are written as DevHub-relative /docs/... paths, but those routes do not exist on this site. They will 404.

Current links:

  • /docs/data-governance/unity-catalog
  • /docs/dev-tools/databricks-apps
  • /docs/mlflow3/genai/eval-monitor

These look like Databricks docs paths pasted as internal links. Please point them at the official docs instead:


This comment was generated with GitHub MCP.

@thisistonydang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In src/content/perspectives/What_platform_ensures_machine_learning_experiments_are_fully_reproducible_across_teams_and_over_time.md, MLflow Projects is described as a current way to record the git commit for a run:

For code, MLflow Projects automatically records the git commit tied to a run...

That sentence links to https://docs.databricks.com/aws/en/archive/mlflow/projects

The Key Takeaways also say MLflow Projects records the git commit tied to each run.

The cited page exists, but it is archived. It states that MLflow Projects is no longer supported, and that the documentation has been retired.

Please drop the present-tense Projects claim, or rewrite it to match current MLflow tracking / run source logging instead of linking to a retired feature.


This comment was generated with GitHub MCP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants