Panasonic LUMIX L10 noise profiles#21528
Draft
andriiryzhkov wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a noise profile for the Panasonic DC-L10. Captured on 25 ISOs from 100 to 25600 with
darktable-gen-noiseprofile.The DC-L10 uses the same 25 MP MFT sensor as the DC-G9M2 (G9II) – Panasonic's L2-generation MFT sensor with on-chip PDAF and dual-conversion-gain readout. DC-G9M2 already has a profile from #17525; this fills the gap for the DC-L10.
Sanity check against DC-G9M2
Since it's the same sensor, the two profiles should be close. Averaged across all 25 ISOs the DC-L10
avalues differ from DC-G9M2 by roughly +1% (R), +0.5% (G), and −3% (B). The R/G asymmetry ratio – the fingerprint of this sensor's noisier red channel – sits at 3.0–3.3 in both profiles.noise_result.pdf
darktable-noiseprofile-20260710.tar.gz