-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
Add config.Resource.OverrideScalarFieldType #724
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4bb37a5
Add the internal.StringOrPrimitive generic type that can handle un/ma…
ulucinar e5bad30
Add config.Resource.OverrideScalarFieldType
ulucinar ff5bdd1
Add types.StringOrBool type
ulucinar 7bffb1d
In types.Builder.buildSchema, honor scalar field type override config…
ulucinar 2084422
Better instructions for Builder.buildSchema error when config.Overrid…
ulucinar 4043e9e
Assert the path passed to OverrideScalarFieldType
ulucinar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing I thought about is exposing
FieldTypeOverrideConfigurationas part of the public API. The The doc of theFieldTypeOverridefield is says that it is only to be used by the code generator, but the returned type is exported. With this state, I am not sure this is just a internal plumbing point. It seems a general use API. What do you think?I didn't think the alternative for this but still wanted to discuss do we really want to export them for general use instead of really generation internal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was initially thinking exposing the
config.Resource.overrideGeneratedFieldType(asconfig.Resource.OverrideGeneratedFieldType) so that we would not need a separateconfig.Resource.OverrideScalarFieldTypeconfiguration method. However, in the future, we may need to support overriding types of non-scalar (complex/collection) fields and if we simply exposeoverrideGeneratedFieldTypeas our configuration API, it also directly exposes upjet code generation pipeline's implementation details.Currently, the only "intended" and exposed configuration API is the
config.Resource.OverrideScalarFieldType, which is what a provider needs to specify to be able to override the generated type for a scalar field, the field's path and the type to be used for the override. Supporting overrides for complex types or collection types in more involved because such fields can differ across the forProvider, initProvider and atProvider API trees. For scalars, they always have the same exact type (and that's the reason theOverrideScalarFieldTypemethod accepts a single type parameter, not separate types for the 3 API trees we have). If we had exposedoverrideGeneratedFieldTypedirectly, it would not be future proof but theOverrideScalarFieldTypeis future proof because it's not a generic override API, i.e., it's not expected to handle non-scalar field type overrides. Also having the configured performed viaOverrideScalarFieldType(instead of directly setting the configuration data structures) would allow us to do some validation in the future.The cost of hiding the implementation detail from the provider authors is then we need to expose that configuration via an accessor because the code generation pipeline that consumes this configuration lives in the package
pkg/types. Go does not have something like a "friend package" concept and aninternalpackage won't help becauseoverrideGeneratedFieldTypeis not exported.FieldTypeOverrideConfigurationandFieldTypeOverrideshould be of no use to the provider authors but we cannot also hide them from the provider authors. That's why I just added a Go doc that tellsFieldTypeOverrideis meant to be used by the code generator.