Repository navigation
Conversation
🟡 Heimdall Review Status
|
|
Thanks for your contribution @craigm26! See here for instructions: https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/about-commit-signature-verification The team will not review this PR before ALL commits have been verified and it will be closed after 1 week of inactivity. Unverified commits:
|
craigm26
force-pushed
the
spec-solidarity-extension
branch
from
October 22, 2026 01:07
0e01f62 to
8479e51
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Draft extension for discussion:
solidaritylets a client attach a separately authorized share, at a rate its owner agreed to in advance, to an allow-listed humanitarian fund.solidarityin/supported, settle the share apart from the purchase (a failed share never changes the purchase result), and report viaEXTENSION-RESPONSES.Open question for maintainers (in the doc): the share is the buyer's choice, so the server does not advertise it. Is a client adding an extension the server did not advertise, when the facilitator supports it, compatible with the v2 extension rules, or does that need a clarification?
Reference checker (Python stdlib), simulated ledger and allocation rule: https://craigmerry.com/solidarity-levy/
Drafted with Claude Code; I have read and reviewed the text. Opening as a draft for feedback before anyone spends review time on it.
Tests
Docs only. The Merkle construction in the doc reproduces the RFC 6962 reference vectors in both reference implementations (
verify.py --selftest,merkle.js).Checklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01HVfVKz85T7urVZ6JnZ3A3E