PyTorch 2.12.1#10659
Conversation
|
please test |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar for branch IB/CMSSW_20_1_X/master. @akritkbehera, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f092e/54045/summary.html Failed External BuildI found compilation error when building: patching file torch/utils/cpp_extension.py
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file torch/utils/cpp_extension.py.rej
error: Bad exit status from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.UbkmbA (%build)
RPM build warnings:
Macro expanded in comment on line 545: %{pkginstroot}/bin/*
Macro expanded in comment on line 550: %{pkginstroot}/${PYTHON3_LIB_SITE_PACKAGES}
|
Removed a specific patch source URL from the file.
|
please test |
|
Pull request #10659 was updated. |
|
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f092e/54047/summary.html Failed External BuildI found compilation error when building: + patch -p1
patching file setup.py
Hunk #1 succeeded at 97 with fuzz 2 (offset 32 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 142.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file setup.py.rej
error: Bad exit status from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.Kw6yXo (%build)
RPM build warnings:
Macro expanded in comment on line 582: %{pkginstroot}/bin/*
Macro expanded in comment on line 587: %{pkginstroot}/${PYTHON3_LIB_SITE_PACKAGES}
|
|
Pull request #10659 was updated. |
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f092e/54053/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
enable gpu |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f092e/54096/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_W7900 Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_T4 Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test for el9_amd64_gcc15 |
|
please test for el9_aarch64_gcc13 |
|
-1 Failed Tests: nvidia_h100UnitTests nvidia_l40sUnitTests nvidia_t4UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f092e/54108/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: |
|
@smuzaffar PyTorch 2.12.1 was released a couple of days ago to fix a couple of bugs and regressions: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/releases/tag/v2.12.1 . |
|
Pull request #10659 was updated. |
|
please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-AMD_MI300X Failed RelVals-AMD_MI300X
Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_W7900 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_T4 Comparison SummarySummary:
Max Memory Comparisons exceeding threshold NVIDIA_H100@cms-sw/core-l2 , I found 1 workflow step(s) with memory usage exceeding the error threshold: Expand to see workflows ...
|
|
+externals |
cmsbuild
added
externals-approved
fully-signed
and removed
externals-pending
pending-signatures
labels
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_20_1_X/master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
3 participants
No description provided.