Skip to content

Publish the 500-task shopping selection and historical agent scores - #68

Merged
MagMueller merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/shopping-stealth-500-20261024
Oct 24, 2026
Merged

MagMueller merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/shopping-stealth-500-20261024

Conversation

@MagMueller

@MagMueller MagMueller commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The current shopping comparison needs one versioned 500-task selection. V10 removes Ozon and Coupang equally, recalculates all scores, and preserves V9 plus every original outcome.

Browser Use Cloud shows 459/500, Dot shows 363/500, and Muse shows 306/500. The owner approves Dot as the display name for the historical OpenAI runner. Its original runner ID remains intact. Instinct remains partial. A later native message reports 292 provisional successes from 382 finished attempts on its original 513-task set. Updated task rows remain missing. Grok retains its separate 36/50 browsing study.

Per-task CAPTCHA report fields support the published counts. Original Muse failure categories distinguish website security blocks from browser errors. Later exclusions and the selected best Cloud run limit generalization. These are historical projections, not fresh V10 runs or infrastructure-only block rates.

Validation: six scoring tests pass. All 500 task IDs and domains are unique. Original outcome values remain unchanged. Public website downloads match the repository files.

The latest native Instinct report gives 292/513 provisional successes and a daily browser-time pause. It includes known partial results. The earlier archive snapshot remains separate.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All reported issues were addressed

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

View guided diff | Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic

Comment thread tests/test_consumer_score.py
Comment thread tests/test_consumer_score.py
Comment thread consumer_bench/README.md
Comment thread consumer_bench/website-examples.json Outdated
Comment thread consumer_bench/exclusions-v10.json
Comment thread consumer_bench/README.md Outdated

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 issue found across 10 files

Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="consumer_bench/grok-historical-50.json">

<violation number="1" location="consumer_bench/grok-historical-50.json:10">
P3: `outcomeCounts` and `successRate` are hardcoded copies of data derived from `outcomes`. Add assertions in the scoring test that each `outcomeCounts` category matches the `outcomes` tally, so later edits cannot silently desynchronize them.</violation>
</file>

Requires human review: Auto-approval blocked because this review re-detected 3 unresolved issues already reported by Cubic.

View guided diff | Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic

Comment thread tests/test_consumer_score.py
Comment thread consumer_bench/README.md Outdated
"runDate": "Oct 12–13, 2026",
"scope": "Search or category, then open a product or result. No cart requirement.",
"note": "Different tasks and CAPTCHA rules. Amazon used an earlier smoke prompt. This is not a matched 500-task score.",
"outcomeCounts": {

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P3: outcomeCounts and successRate are hardcoded copies of data derived from outcomes. Add assertions in the scoring test that each outcomeCounts category matches the outcomes tally, so later edits cannot silently desynchronize them.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At consumer_bench/grok-historical-50.json, line 10:

<comment>`outcomeCounts` and `successRate` are hardcoded copies of data derived from `outcomes`. Add assertions in the scoring test that each `outcomeCounts` category matches the `outcomes` tally, so later edits cannot silently desynchronize them.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+  "runDate": "Oct 12–13, 2026",
+  "scope": "Search or category, then open a product or result. No cart requirement.",
+  "note": "Different tasks and CAPTCHA rules. Amazon used an earlier smoke prompt. This is not a matched 500-task score.",
+  "outcomeCounts": {
+    "success": 36,
+    "uncleared challenge": 7,
</file context>
Fix with cubic

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All reported issues were addressed across 5 files (changes from recent commits).

Tip: Review your code locally with the cubic CLI to iterate faster.

View guided diff | Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic

Comment thread consumer_bench/exclusions-v10.json Outdated
@MagMueller
MagMueller merged commit e303cb7 into main Oct 24, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants