Skip to content

process: Remove Luke from BIP Editors - #2248

Merged
jonatack merged 1 commit into
bitcoin:masterfrom
murchandamus:editors-luke
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

process: Remove Luke from BIP Editors#2248
jonatack merged 1 commit into
bitcoin:masterfrom
murchandamus:editors-luke

Conversation

@murchandamus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I sent an email to the Bitcoin Developer list, recommending the removal of Luke Dashjr from the BIP Editors (copied below). I open this pull request as a sample implementation of my recommendation.

Hello everyone,

I recommend that Luke Dashjr be removed from the position of BIP Editor.

Over the past several years, Luke has been at the center of many contentious disputes within the Bitcoin ecosystem, and this week a new forkcoin spun out of Bitcoin under his leadership.

More specifically, Luke was heavily involved in the creation and implementation of BIP110, the proposal that led to the fork. During that process, he also exercised his authority as a BIP Editor inconsistently with the established editorial process unfairly favoring the proposal he was involved in. For example, he attempted to assign a BIP number to the draft publicly on Twitter before the proposal had been discussed on the mailing list, and he merged a PR updating the BIP within minutes of the PR being opened.

The latter is particularly notable given that Luke has otherwise made hardly any contributions to the day-to-day work of the BIP Editors since the additional editors began serving in April 2024: he left fewer than 1% of the BIP Editor comments in the repository since then, and the merge action of this PR was his first since May 2024.

Communication between Luke and other BIP Editors had already broken down last year, following a discussion about his attempt to side-step the process by prematurely assigning a BIP number out of band.

Taken together, I believe these circumstances raise serious concerns about Luke continuing to hold editorial authority. In particular:

  • he has exercised his editorial privileges in a manner that raises conflict-of-interest concerns;
  • he has contributed little to the ongoing workload of the BIP Editors;
  • his recent championing of a contentious soft fork that now appears to evolve into a hard fork represents a complete departure from the Bitcoin development ecosystem; and
  • trust, communication, and coordination with the other BIP Editors have broken down.

For these reasons, I motion that Luke be removed as a BIP Editor.

Murch

@murchandamus murchandamus added the Process Trying to update process or stuck due to disagreement about Process label Aug 9, 2026
@SatsAndSports

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ACK

2 similar comments
@jlopp

jlopp commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ACK

@caesrcd

caesrcd commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ACK

@murchandamus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Looks like the Ayes had it.

@jonatack jonatack left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verified that Luke no longer has editor/admin privileges in this repository, after the mail list discussion at https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/knbv3MFwlvU/m/QDk8tddyCAAJ.

The list in BIP 3 therefore should be updated to reflect that change, as done here.

@jonatack
jonatack merged commit 996d09a into bitcoin:master Aug 10, 2026
4 checks passed
@murchandamus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Process Trying to update process or stuck due to disagreement about Process

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants