Only load compiler plugins from direct dependencies - #1885
Open
markvasiv wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
markvasiv
requested review from
aaronsky,
adincebic,
brentleyjones,
keith and
luispadron
as code owners
August 11, 2026 08:57
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
compile()to walk only the direct modules of the compilation's swift_infos and private_swift_infos, making the code match its documented intent ("we only need to load plugins directly used by the module being compiled"). Module propagation (search paths, explicit module maps) is untouched, so dependents can still resolve the serialized macro attribute when deserializing.-load-plugin-executable, and the transitive dependent does not.Why