Add blog post on Meta Muse Spark 1.1#3092
Conversation
Appwrite WebsiteProject ID: Website (appwrite/website)Project ID: Tip Git integration provides automatic deployments with optional PR comments |
Greptile SummaryThis PR adds an unlisted blog post covering Meta Muse Spark 1.1's public API preview, along with its AVIF cover image and a corresponding optimize-cache entry.
Confidence Score: 5/5Safe to merge — this is a content-only addition of an unlisted blog post with no changes to application logic, routing, or shared components. The change adds three files: a new markdoc post, its AVIF cover image, and a single cache-entry addition. The post is marked unlisted so it won't surface in listings before the team is ready. All internal links are relative and consistent with existing posts. No application code is touched. No files require special attention. Important Files Changed
Reviews (3): Last reviewed commit: "Optimize cover image: convert cover.png ..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| The pattern is clear. Muse Spark 1.1 looks especially competitive on **tool-use and workflow-agent benchmarks**, including MCP Atlas, JobBench, Humanity's Last Exam with tools, and Finance Agent v2. It is less clearly ahead on pure coding-agent benchmarks. Meta's own report says Muse Spark 1.1 trails Claude Opus 4.8 and/or GPT-5.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and SWE-Bench Pro, while showing meaningful gains over Muse Spark 1.0. | ||
|
|
||
| There is one independent signal already worth noting. [Scale's SWE-Bench Pro public leaderboard](https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/swe_bench_pro_public) describes SWE-Bench Pro as a harder long-horizon software-engineering benchmark built around complex professional repositories, and Meta's report says Muse Spark 1.1's SWE-Bench Pro result is sourced from Scale. That is stronger than a purely internal coding score, but it is still one benchmark and one harness. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The value Muse Spark / Opus 4.8 at 82.2 in the "Strongest compared model" column is confusing because "Muse Spark" already appears as the subject of the row. Readers will wonder whether this refers to a prior Muse Spark version (e.g. 1.0), a tie between two models, or a data error. If it means both Muse Spark (prior) and Opus 4.8 both scored 82.2, the cell should read something like Muse Spark 1.0 / Opus 4.8 (tied at 82.2) or simply Opus 4.8 at 82.2 if Muse Spark 1.0 is irrelevant to the comparison.
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: src/routes/blog/post/meta-muse-spark-1-1/+page.markdoc
Line: 82
Comment:
**Ambiguous "Strongest compared model" value for MCP Atlas**
The value `Muse Spark / Opus 4.8 at 82.2` in the "Strongest compared model" column is confusing because "Muse Spark" already appears as the subject of the row. Readers will wonder whether this refers to a prior Muse Spark version (e.g. 1.0), a tie between two models, or a data error. If it means both Muse Spark (prior) and Opus 4.8 both scored 82.2, the cell should read something like `Muse Spark 1.0 / Opus 4.8 (tied at 82.2)` or simply `Opus 4.8 at 82.2` if Muse Spark 1.0 is irrelevant to the comparison.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
|
@copilot run |
Done. Converted |
Summary
Source tweet: https://x.com/finkd/status/2075218444056707458
Validation
bun format && bun optimize.bun formatafter the final wording change.bun run checkcurrently fails in this local checkout because required Appwrite environment variables are not exported, includingPUBLIC_APPWRITE_ENDPOINT,PUBLIC_APPWRITE_DASHBOARD,PUBLIC_GROWTH_ENDPOINT, and related init/thread IDs.