storage: Rename data_volume_template_dict#5535
Conversation
|
Report bugs in Issues Welcome! 🎉This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features: 🔄 Automatic Actions
📋 Available CommandsPR Status Management
Review & Approval
Testing & Validation
Container Operations
Cherry-pick Operations
Branch Management
Label Management
✅ Merge RequirementsThis PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:
📊 Review ProcessApprovers and ReviewersApprovers:
Reviewers:
Available Labels
AI Features
Security Checks
💡 Tips
📌 Additional InformationCustom Commands:
For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe helper function ChangesHelper Rename and Call-Site Update
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5535 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.67% 98.67%
=======================================
Files 25 42 +17
Lines 2487 2495 +8
=======================================
+ Hits 2454 2462 +8
Misses 33 33
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…t_with_pvc_source Signed-off-by: rkishner <rkishner@redhat.com>
0706f8e to
8c1449a
Compare
|
/build-and-push-container |
|
New container for quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:pr-5535 published |
|
/test-plan |
Test execution plan request detailsCRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file. As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan. Analysis Requirements:
Output rules: Your deliverable: Test Execution Plan
Use these formats:
Real test commands (MANDATORY when changes affect session/runtime code): When the affected code runs at session/collection time (conftest fixtures, pytest plugins,
Example output for a session-startup fix: Guidelines:
Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK): When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:
CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES: When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:
ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):
Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise. CRITICAL — Verification rules for smoke and gating decisions: |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -e
echo "=== git diff for utilities/storage.py ==="
git log --oneline -1
echo "--- search old and new function names ---"
rg -n 'data_volume_template_dict\b' --type py
echo "---"
rg -n 'data_volume_template_dict_with_pvc_source' --type py
echo "=== markers in test_clone.py ==="
sed -n '1,60p' tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py
echo "=== conftest chain markers ==="
fd conftest.py tests/storage/cdi_clone
fd conftest.py tests/storage
cat tests/storage/cdi_clone/conftest.py 2>/dev/null | head -80
echo "=== check smoke/gating marker on file ==="
rg -n '`@pytest.mark.smoke`|`@pytest.mark.gating`' tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.pyLength of output: 2668
Test Execution Plan
Since this is a straightforward rename with no logic change, no Note: This plan should be re-verified once repository access is restored, particularly to confirm there are no other, currently-undetected callers of the old function name and to check smoke/gating marker status definitively. [skip_review_follow_up_policy] |
|
Verification failed for PR #5535. Execution details |
|
/verified |
Test execution plan request detailsCRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file. As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan. Analysis Requirements:
Output rules: Your deliverable: Test Execution Plan
Use these formats:
Real test commands (MANDATORY when changes affect session/runtime code): When the affected code runs at session/collection time (conftest fixtures, pytest plugins,
Example output for a session-startup fix: Guidelines:
Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK): When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:
CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES: When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:
ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):
Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise. CRITICAL — Verification rules for smoke and gating decisions: |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -e
echo "=== search for old and new function names ==="
rg -n 'data_volume_template_dict\b' --type py || true
echo "---"
rg -n 'data_volume_template_dict_with_pvc_source' --type py || true
echo "=== test_clone.py content head ==="
sed -n '1,60p' tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py
echo "=== markers in test_clone.py ==="
grep -n 'pytest.mark' tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py || true
echo "=== conftest files in chain ==="
fd conftest.py tests/storage/cdi_clone
fd conftest.py tests/storage
fd conftest.py tests -d 1
echo "=== check conftest for data_volume_template_dict usage ==="
rg -n 'data_volume_template_dict' tests/storage/cdi_clone/conftest.py tests/storage/conftest.py tests/conftest.py 2>/dev/null || true
echo "=== smoke and gating marked files referencing storage.py symbols ==="
rg -l '`@pytest.mark.smoke`' tests/ | xargs -I{} sh -c 'grep -l "data_volume_template_dict\|create_vm_from_clone_dv_template" {} 2>/dev/null' || true
rg -l '`@pytest.mark.gating`' tests/ | xargs -I{} sh -c 'grep -l "data_volume_template_dict\|create_vm_from_clone_dv_template" {} 2>/dev/null' || trueLength of output: 3131
Based on the previously available PR summary (unchanged since my last reply), the best-effort Test Execution Plan remains: Test Execution Plan
This is unchanged from my earlier analysis since repository access has not been restored. If this recurs, it may be worth checking the sandbox's Git credentials/token configuration for this repository. [skip_review_follow_up_policy] |
|
/approve |
1 similar comment
|
/approve |
|
Successfully removed PR tag: quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:pr-5535. |
|
New container for quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:latest published |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Rename
data_volume_template_dicttodata_volume_template_dict_with_pvc_sourceas suggested by @jpeimerWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for reviewer:
jira-ticket:
Summary by CodeRabbit