-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
Sireesha taking over for Linh - Add multi-select and bulk actions to Materials table _be #2178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
linh2020
wants to merge
8
commits into
development
Choose a base branch
from
linh_bulk_actions_materials_backend
base: development
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+266
−8
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
611376e
feat(bmdashboard/materials): add persistent bulk actions endpoint for…
linh2020 a799f10
fix: validate material ids
kunchalasireesha 72ee27e
fix: report real modified count from bulk material action
kunchalasireesha 810cd99
test: assert GET /bm/materials returns stockHold, isReviewed and notes
kunchalasireesha f420008
chore: revert package-lock.json peer and dev marker churn
kunchalasireesha 94716f9
Merge branch 'development' into linh_bulk_actions_materials_backend
kunchalasireesha 796fe01
test: cover bulk material action edge cases for SonarCloud gate
kunchalasireesha 94b9b07
fix: report matchedCount instead of modifiedCount for bulk actions
kunchalasireesha File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can bulk-modify any materials but has no permission check - any authenticated user can call it. Most controllers here gate with hasPermission(req.body.requestor, ...). I think this might need to be restricted.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The bulk-actions endpoint sits behind the same JWT auth as the rest of /api/bm. None of the existing materials write endpoints (bmPurchaseMaterials, bmPostMaterialUpdateBulk, bmupdatePurchaseStatus) use hasPermission, and there's no materials permission string in the seed yet. Adding a proper manageMaterials permission across the BM controllers is worth doing as its own PR rather than bolting it onto just this endpoint.