[19.0][MIG] ddmrp_report_part_flow_index: Migration to 19.0 - #618
Open
dnplkndll wants to merge 22 commits into
Open
[19.0][MIG] ddmrp_report_part_flow_index: Migration to 19.0#618dnplkndll wants to merge 22 commits into
dnplkndll wants to merge 22 commits into
Conversation
OCA-git-bot
added
series:19.0
mod:ddmrp_report_part_flow_index
dnplkndll
marked this pull request as ready for review
June 16, 2026 14:02
Comment on lines
14
to
31
| def _calc_flow_index_group_id(self): | ||
| flow_index_reports = self.env["report.ddmrp.part.plan.flow.index"].read_group( | ||
| domain=[("buffer_id", "in", self.ids)], | ||
| fields=["order_frequency_group"], | ||
| groupby=["buffer_id"], | ||
| self.env["stock.buffer"].flush_model() | ||
| frequency_by_buffer = dict( | ||
| self.env["report.ddmrp.part.plan.flow.index"]._read_group( | ||
| domain=[("buffer_id", "in", self.ids)], | ||
| groupby=["buffer_id"], | ||
| aggregates=["order_frequency_group:sum"], | ||
| ) | ||
| ) | ||
| flow_index_groups = self.env["ddmrp.flow.index.group"].search([]) | ||
| flow_index_groups = self.env["ddmrp.flow.index.group"].search([]) # pylint: disable=no-search-all | ||
| for rec in self: | ||
| flow_index_report = list( | ||
| filter(lambda x: x["buffer_id"][0] == rec.id, flow_index_reports) | ||
| ) | ||
| if not flow_index_report: | ||
| if rec not in frequency_by_buffer: | ||
| continue | ||
|
|
||
| frequency_group = flow_index_report[0]["order_frequency_group"] | ||
| frequency_group = frequency_by_buffer[rec] | ||
| for index_group in flow_index_groups: | ||
| if index_group.upper_range and index_group.lower_range: | ||
| if ( |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have tested functionally and these changes might have generated an issue.
In ruboat, I increased a MOQ of a buffer to make its order_frequency_group grow, but after refreshing the buffer, the flow index group didn't change:
PD: I used the index groups already created in runboat, but they are inverted (the name is misleading): low order frequency should be high flow and viceversa.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I started to but was not able to reproduce. on vaca this week. fine if you want to supersede it in the mean time.
ledoent@21d9de4
it seemed like there might be opportunity to add the report as well. but will not likely get to look for another week.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No problem, not urgent, just checking the status
Contributor
|
/ocabot migration ddmrp_report_part_flow_index |
dnplkndll
force-pushed
the
19.0-mig-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 18, 2026 16:40
223ba48 to
4e15866
Compare
dnplkndll
force-pushed
the
19.0-mig-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 22, 2026 18:33
0d3695b to
2efa264
Compare
dnplkndll
force-pushed
the
19.0-mig-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index
branch
3 times, most recently
from
July 7, 2026 13:34
eb094dc to
8376350
Compare
Currently translated at 100.0% (26 of 26 strings) Translation: ddmrp-16.0/ddmrp-16.0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/ddmrp-16-0/ddmrp-16-0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (31 of 31 strings) Translation: ddmrp-16.0/ddmrp-16.0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/ddmrp-16-0/ddmrp-16-0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (32 of 32 strings) Translation: ddmrp-16.0/ddmrp-16.0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/ddmrp-16-0/ddmrp-16-0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (31 of 31 strings) Translation: ddmrp-16.0/ddmrp-16.0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/ddmrp-16-0/ddmrp-16-0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (30 of 30 strings) Translation: ddmrp-17.0/ddmrp-17.0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/ddmrp-17-0/ddmrp-17-0-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index/it/
…n the report Also, take the ocassion to make buffer_id clickable in tree view.
Signed-off-by: Don Kendall <dkendall@ledoweb.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Kendall <dkendall@ledoweb.com>
dnplkndll
force-pushed
the
19.0-mig-ddmrp_report_part_flow_index
branch
from
July 9, 2026 16:07
8376350 to
6e0a481
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Port of
ddmrp_report_part_flow_index(DDMRP Report Part Flow Index) from 18.0 to 19.0.