-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
Promote scalars to constants in ndd arithmetic operators #6475
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rostan-t
wants to merge
2
commits into
NVIDIA:main
Choose a base branch
from
rostan-t:ndd-optimize-arithm-ops
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+34
−18
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[Critical] Python
intis unbounded, but this gets packed intointeger_constants, declared asstd::vector<int32_t>inarithmetic.cc. Values outside the int32 range are silently wrapped, not rejected or promoted to int64.Verified against the actual op (pre-existing
_ArithmeticGenericOp, unaffected by this PR's C++ change):fn._arithmetic_generic_op(data, expression_desc="add(&0 $0:int32)", integer_constants=[5_000_000_000])on a[1, 2, 3]input returns[705032705, 705032706, 705032707]—5_000_000_000 mod 2**32, no error, no warning.Before this PR, an int scalar went through
as_tensor(arg), andnp.array(5_000_000_000).dtypeisint64— so this is a real precision/correctness regression for any int64-range scalar (timestamps, large counts, hashes, etc.), not just a style change. Worth at least clamping/validating the range and raising, or falling back to a tensor input when the value doesn't fit in int32.