Skip to content

docs: replace metrics field table with a navigable index - #46

Merged
BraCR10 merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
docs/book-metrics-index
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

docs: replace metrics field table with a navigable index#46
BraCR10 merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
docs/book-metrics-index

Conversation

@BraCR10

@BraCR10 BraCR10 commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

The previous PR added a JSON field reference table. That was a misread of the request:
what was wanted was a navigable index, not a serialization reference.

Index (metrics/README.md): one row per metric, name hyperlinked to its section,
with a short statement of what it measures. All 11 metrics, deep-linked.

Not-applicable conditions restored into the pages. They previously lived only in
the removed table. Each metric now states four fixed fields: Definition, Computation,
Not applicable, Usability — 11 of each across the section.

Activity grid page reordered. Its usability statement had drifted under the
Granularity sub-heading; it now sits with the metric. Sub-sections no longer borrow the
per-metric labels, and the progress indicator threshold is explicitly marked as process
feedback rather than a metric.

Test plan

  • mdbook build clean
  • All 11 index links verified against existing headings
  • Label counts balanced: 11 Definition / 11 Computation / 11 Not applicable / 11 Usability

Replaces the JSON field reference table with an index listing each of
the 11 metrics and linking to its section.

Restores the per-metric not-applicable conditions into the pages as a
fourth fixed field, so every metric now states Definition,
Computation, Not applicable, and Usability.

Reorders the activity grid page so its usability statement sits with
the metric rather than under a sub-heading, and marks the progress
indicator threshold as process feedback rather than a metric.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@BraCR10, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 48 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2cbdacc3-5b2d-4e8c-b03e-52c5c9b77dca

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ae9848 and e66d102.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • book/src/metrics/README.md
  • book/src/metrics/activity-grid.md
  • book/src/metrics/context-signals.md
  • book/src/metrics/disputes-bond-policy.md
  • book/src/metrics/longevity-liveness.md
  • book/src/metrics/trade-size-consistency.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@BraCR10
BraCR10 merged commit 55f1f9d into development Jul 31, 2026
4 checks passed
@BraCR10
BraCR10 deleted the docs/book-metrics-index branch July 31, 2026 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant