-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.9k
fix(settings): preserve concurrent updates #2137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
chioarub
wants to merge
2
commits into
Gitlawb:main
Choose a base branch
from
chioarub:fix/preserve-concurrent-settings-updates
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift
Blocking lock waits now run on the background sync path. Bound them separately.
replaceSettingsFileSyncblocks the thread withAtomics.waitfor up toSETTINGS_LOCK_WAIT_MS(2000 ms) per call.applyRemoteEntriesToLocalcallswriteSettingsFileForSynctwice, for user settings and for project settings. Under contention the background sync therefore freezes the event loop for up to 4 s.src/utils/settings/settings.transaction.test.tslines 242-293 model a 4.5 s holder, so contention is a real scenario, not a theoretical one.updateSettingsForSourceblocks in response to a user action, which is defensible. Remote sync runs opportunistically without user intent, so the same ceiling is harder to justify.Two options, in order of cost:
Not a merge blocker if the maintainers accept the current ceiling, but please record the decision.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update
Retained the shared bounded contention policy.
Not changed