Display different message when comments are turned off

[caetano-dev]

Pull Request Type

• Feature Implementation

Related issue

closes #9657

Description

Shows a message for when comments are turned off instead of the same message for no comments.

Screenshots

Testing

1. Open https://youtu.be/3uAIqqg8ZHo
2. Click on the button to load comments
3. Open https://youtu.be/0GNeqN0sWlc
4. See that the message is different
5. Open https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxaotJMxw_9fCQQ7Nc3C1N94IlUty6AxMD
6. See it shows the new message for posts as well.

Desktop

• OS: MacOS
• OS Version: 27
• FreeTube version: v0.25.3 Beta

[Shadorc]

Testing https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxaotJMxw_9fCQQ7Nc3C1N94IlUty6AxMD with Invidious throws
SyntaxError: Failed to execute 'json' on 'Response': Unexpected end of JSON input

Update: After some investigation, it seems that my invidious instance (latest docker image up to date) returns a completely empty response in this case, while the instance's logs show:

[invidious]    |   Exception: Comments not found. (NotFoundException)
[invidious]    |   from /usr/share/crystal/src/json/any.cr:100:10 in 'parse_youtube'
[invidious]    |   from src/invidious/helpers/handlers.cr:31:37 in 'call'
[invidious]    |   from lib/kemal/src/kemal/filter_handler.cr:22:7 in 'call'
[invidious]    |   from /usr/share/crystal/src/http/server/handler.cr:30:7 in 'call'
[invidious]    |   from /usr/share/crystal/src/http/server/handler.cr:30:7 in 'call'
[invidious]    |   from /usr/share/crystal/src/http/server/request_processor.cr:58:11 in 'handle_client'
[invidious]    |   from /usr/share/crystal/src/fiber.cr:170:11 in 'run'
[invidious]    |   from ???

So it does not seem to be an issue with this MR, only that this change cannot be reviewed as Invidious does not return a valid response

The bug does not concern this MR

[PikachuEXE]

I tested https://youtu.be/uPYx12xJFUQ from #5879 and I got error caused by #9620 (comment)

I will hold off until that's fixed (in PR at least so I can merge locally

Dismissing in case another Code Owner missed comment above