-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
Allow skipping checks of some tracer fields #678
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions
4
cime_config/testdefs/testmods_dirs/drv/water_tracers/user_nl_cpl
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,2 +1,6 @@ | ||
| water_tracer_initial_ratios = "0.1:2" | ||
| water_tracers_do_checks = .true. | ||
|
|
||
| ! Tracers currently aren't mapped properly for irrigation | ||
| ! (https://github.com/escomp/cmeps/issues/675), so bypass tracer checks for this field | ||
| water_tracers_variables_not_checked = "FBExprof%Flrl_irrig_wtracers" |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks like a bigger diff than it really is: The conditional has been rearranged so that this
.not. isPresentNonTraceris the first block, and then the standard case is in theelse. This made sense at first because there were going to be multiple skip conditions so it was going to look like:It ended up making more sense to put the variable-in-skip-list check inside the main code branch - because it was simplest to check/set this in the wtracers_check_tracer_ratios call - but I felt like I marginally liked this conditional block arrangement better because it lends itself better to possible future changes (such as new ways to skip a variable), and I had already done testing with this code structure, so I decided to leave this change in place.