Skip to content

PREWAVE-BE-049 — Authorize and Make Dead-Letter Replay Idempotent #643

Closed

Description

@dDevAhmed

Problem context

Post-Wave-9 source audit identified this as a distinct production-readiness boundary not fully owned by the existing candidate backlog.

Technical scope

  • Require protected capability, reason, bounds, dry run, original payload hash, and audit record for replay.
  • Prevent replay across release/schema incompatibility.

Required tests

  • Unauthorized, stale release, duplicate replay, batch limit, poison message, partial failure, and audit tests.

Acceptance criteria

  • Replay is denied by default.
  • One message cannot produce duplicate effects.
  • Original and replay references are linked immutably.
  • Operators can stop/resume bounded batches.

Architecture and security constraints

  • Canonical contracts/finalized events remain authoritative.
  • Bind chain-derived data to chain ID, release ID, deployment block, and artifact checksum.
  • Fail closed on stale, ambiguous, missing, or unauthorized state.
  • Do not weaken CI, strict typing, privacy, or auditability.

Dependencies

Non-goals

  • Unrelated feature work or mainnet deployment.
  • Applying Stellar Wave before maintainer activation.

Complexity and points

  • High — 200 points

Candidate only; activation remains maintainer-controlled.

Activity

  1. isahpeter656-coder commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @isahpeter656-coder

    @isahpeter656-coder has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hello maintainer I have reviewed the issue and I have relevant experience on it I would deliver please assign this issue to me

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @isahpeter656-coder to this issue.

  2. Matrixthechoppedboy commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @Matrixthechoppedboy
    Contributor

    @Matrixthechoppedboy has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi Maintainer, I’d like to work on this issue. I have relevant experience with similar tasks and am available to start right away.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Matrixthechoppedboy to this issue.

  3. Timrossid commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @Timrossid
    Contributor

    @Timrossid has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi maintainer, I’ve reviewed this issue and I would love to work on this. I am confident that I will be able to resolve it neatly.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Timrossid to this issue.

  4. drips-wave commented on Oct 16, 2026

    @drips-wave

    Congratulations, @Matrixthechoppedboy! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.

    🧑‍💻 @Matrixthechoppedboy: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.

    Warning

    When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.

    🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.

    🌊 Happy Wave 🌊

  5. drips-wave commented on Oct 19, 2026

    @drips-wave

    This issue has been completed by @Matrixthechoppedboy as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th Wave 🥳

    😎 @Matrixthechoppedboy: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.

    🧑‍💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions