Skip to content

PREWAVE-BE-046 — Replace Generic Claim Lifecycle Errors With Typed Domain Results #642

Closed

Description

@dDevAhmed

Problem context

Post-Wave-9 source audit identified this as a distinct production-readiness boundary not fully owned by the existing candidate backlog.

Technical scope

  • Replace generic Error paths for missing claims and invalid transitions with stable typed errors/HTTP mappings.
  • Preserve canonical state/phase and idempotent retry semantics.

Required tests

  • Missing, forbidden, wrong phase, duplicate, stale projection, reorged, and invalid transition tests.

Acceptance criteria

  • Clients can distinguish not-found, denied, conflict, stale, and unavailable.
  • Error codes are versioned and documented.
  • Internal details are not leaked.
  • State transitions remain contract-derived.

Architecture and security constraints

  • Canonical contracts/finalized events remain authoritative.
  • Bind chain-derived data to chain ID, release ID, deployment block, and artifact checksum.
  • Fail closed on stale, ambiguous, missing, or unauthorized state.
  • Do not weaken CI, strict typing, privacy, or auditability.

Dependencies

Non-goals

  • Unrelated feature work or mainnet deployment.
  • Applying Stellar Wave before maintainer activation.

Complexity and points

  • Medium — 150 points

Candidate only; activation remains maintainer-controlled.

Activity

  1. Priest-Codes commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @Priest-Codes
    Contributor

    @Priest-Codes has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Please can i work on this

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Priest-Codes to this issue.

  2. Olajcodes commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @Olajcodes

    @Olajcodes has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi maintainer! I would love to help you with this issue. Given my theoretical knowledge and background, I am quite sure that I am well-equipped to tackle it. Please kindly assign it to me.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Olajcodes to this issue.

  3. Olabsy19 commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @Olabsy19
    Contributor

    @Olabsy19 has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hello maintainer! If you entrust me with the responsibility of solving this issue, I guarantee you of the amazing solution I will provide and you won't be disappointed.
    Thanks!

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Olabsy19 to this issue.

  4. drips-wave commented on Oct 16, 2026

    @drips-wave

    Congratulations, @Olabsy19! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.

    🧑‍💻 @Olabsy19: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.

    Warning

    When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.

    🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.

    🌊 Happy Wave 🌊

  5. drips-wave commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @drips-wave

    This issue has been completed by @Olabsy19 as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th Wave 🥳

    😎 @Olabsy19: You earned 150 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.

    🧑‍💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions