From 0de0ce3389f2071d0448e64380f023e936ee6d69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: fmterrors Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 15:13:09 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] docs(ethreceipts): fix monitor comment wording Signed-off-by: fmterrors --- ethreceipts/ethreceipts.go | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ethreceipts/ethreceipts.go b/ethreceipts/ethreceipts.go index cd7854f0..5569d883 100644 --- a/ethreceipts/ethreceipts.go +++ b/ethreceipts/ethreceipts.go @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ func (l *ReceiptsListener) listener() error { // TODO/NOTE: perhaps in an extended node failure. could there be a scenario // where filterer.Exhausted is never hit? and this subscription never unsubscribes..? // TODO: we ultimately need to check the monitor and if we get no new blocks for a period - // of time, then we can assume node problems.. even more helpful woudl be if the monitor + // of time, then we can assume node problems.. even more helpful would be if the monitor // gave us an error count of node failures, and we'd listen on that, and if we hit a threshold // and our block number doesn't change after a period of time, then we return an error // that we're exhausted due to a node failure.